ArticleObesity surgery2022
The Factor Structure and Stability of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) in a Population Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Headache Phenotype and the Psychosocial Burden of Cluster Headaches: An Analysis of Patients Prior to Hospitalization.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDepression is a multifaceted psychiatric condition that has been associated with suboptimal weight loss following bariatric surgery. Previous variations of Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) subscales been proposed, including those identified within bariatric populations; however, it is unclear whether the BDI-II items contained within these subscales would remain consistent after the procedure considering the physical and lifestyle changes that occur following bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsA two-step analytic approach that comprised of exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) that aimed to identify a stable factor structure using pre- and 6-month post-surgical BDI-II responses. Baseline BDI-II responses of 149 patients (Group 1) were used to identify an initial EFA model. Five BDI-II models underwent CFA using BDI-II responses of a comparable pre-surgical group (Group 2; n = 142), and 6-month post-surgical data from Group 1.
resultsEFA generated a two-factor solution. Of the five CFA models performed, the three-factor model that was initially identified by Hayes (2015) among patients undergoing bariatric surgery demonstrated superior fit across time and between groups.
conclusionsAlthough the EFA initially identified a two-factor model, CFA determined that a previously defined three-factor model reliably fit both pre- and post-surgical BDI-II responses. This study supports using the Hayes (2015) subscales when monitoring pre- and post-bariatric surgery facets of depression specific to this population. Being able to accurately and reliably monitor depressive symptoms of patients that are undergoing bariatric surgery will allow for the provision and monitoring of targeted interventions aimed at improving their mental and physical health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.