ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Mechanical micromodeling of stress-shielding at the bone-implant interphase under shear loading.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sculpting the Future of Bone: The Evolution of Absorbable Materials in Orthopedics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Next-generation craniomaxillofacial implants for reconstructive surgery: balancing biomechanics, biocompatibility, and bioactivity.International journal of oral science · 2026Review
- Piezoelectric scaffolds for bone regeneration: a systematic review of preclinical studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Artificial vertebral body versus titanium mesh cage for single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF): a propensity score matching analysis of fusion, implant subsidence and clinical outcomes.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Mimicking Design Scaffolds Based on Nonwoven Biological Materials of Silk Cocoon for Soft Tissue Engineering at the Bone Interfacial Area: Structure, Morphology, and Performance Evaluation Based on In Vitro Testing, and Identification of Applied Biomaterials.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Effect of Crestal Position on Bone-Implant Stress Interface of Three-Implant Splinted Prostheses: A Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The relationship between stress shielding, bone density changes and implant migration, failure and fracture after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Mandibular Implants: A Metamaterial-Based Approach to Reducing Stress Shielding.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Subsidence of the Corail stem in total hip arthroplasty: no influence of bony contact.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024Article
- Osteointegration of functionalised high-performance oxide ceramics: imaging from micro-computed tomography.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Role of Inorganic Fillers on the Physical Aging and Toughness Loss of PLLA/BaSOACS applied polymer materials · 2023Article
- Estrogen deficiency impedes fracture healing despite eliminating the excessive absorption of the posterior callus in a semi-fixed distal tibial fracture mouse model.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Inserting a titanium implant in the bone tissue may modify its physiological loading and therefore cause bone resorption, via a phenomenon called stress-shielding. The local stress field around the bone-implant interphase (BII) created under shear loading may be influenced by different parameters such as the bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio, the bone Young's modulus, the implant roughness and the implant material. A 2-D finite element model was developed to model the BII and evaluate the impact of the aforementioned parameters. The implant roughness was described by a sinusoidal function (height 2Δ, wavelength λ), and different values of the BIC ratio were simulated. A heterogeneous distribution of the maximum shear stress was evidenced in the periprosthetic bone tissue, with high interfacial stress for low BIC ratios and low implant roughness and underloaded regions near the roughness valleys. Both phenomena may lead to stress-shielding-related effects, which were concentrated within a distance lower than 0.8λ from the implant surface. Choosing an implant material with mechanical properties matching those of bone tissue leads to a homogenized shear stress field and could help to prevent stress-shielding effects. Finally, the equivalent shear modulus of the BII was derived to replace its complex behavior with a simpler analytical model in future studies. Schematic illustrations of the 2-D finite element model used in the present study and spatial variation of the maximal shear stress in the periprosthetic bone tissue for different implant roughness and bone-implant contact ratios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.