Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36169877›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2023

Quantitative study of aortic strain injuries originating from traffic accidents.

Na Yang, Jiexiong Wang, Tao Liu

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Na YangSchool of Automotive Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai, Shandong, China. ynhelen@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2865-4431
Jiexiong WangSchool of Automotive Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai, Shandong, China.
Tao LiuSchool of Automotive Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai, Shandong, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51905121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic injuries are the second leading cause of death after head injuries due to traffic accidents, and strain-induced injuries are becoming increasingly prominent. The quantitative study of aortic strain injury allows for a rapid assessment of the degree of aortic injury after an accident and timely diagnosis of the pathology of aortic injury. It is more reliable than diagnosis based on clinical symptoms alone and it is faster than diagnosis based on imaging. Based on the porcine aortic tensile and injury tests, this study obtained the maximum stress threshold of the aorta that can withstand tensile stress and the safe stress threshold under tensile action, which provides a more detailed data reference about aortic injury in the field of internal medicine. Injuries to the aorta under various degrees of traction were analyzed in detail. A comprehensive and quantitative evaluation criterion for aortic strain injury was proposed, which provides a more in-depth reference for the mechanism of aortic strain injury. In addition, combining it with current imaging promises a combination of numbers and shapes for rapid and accurate diagnosis of aortic strain injury.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficCraniocerebral TraumaAnimalsAortaSwineAortaEvaluation criterionForensicPathologyStrain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.