ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Second Surgery in Patients with Concomitant Esotropia.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nomogram-based model to predict prognosis in anisometropic amblyopia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study developed and validated a nomogram for predicting the risk of second surgery in patients with concomitant esotropia (CE) based on a cohort in Beijing.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, the inpatient and outpatient medical records of 419 patients with CE who underwent surgery at the Peking University First Hospital between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009 were collected. A total of 357 CE cases were included. For those cases 70% were randomly assigned to the training set (n = 234) and 30% to the validation set (n = 123). Demographic and clinical variables were ascertained at hospital admission and discharge and screened using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to construct predictive models and generate a 1-, 4-, and 8-year overall survival nomogram. This nomogram provided an estimate of the risk of second surgery in patients with surgically treated CE. Internal validation was conducted using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve for the training and validation sets.
resultsSix independent prognostic factors were identified, namely age at surgery, age at onset, amblyopia, deviation angles, surgical amount, and deviation angles 1 week after surgery, and these were entered into the nomogram. The proposed nomogram showed favorable discrimination and accuracy in the training and validation sets. The C-indexes of the training and validation sets were 0.84 (95% CI 0.79-0.89) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.78-0.82), respectively.
conclusionsThe proposed nomogram can serve as a predictive tool for prognostic evaluation of CE surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.