Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36169766›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2022

Propensities of Some Amino Acid Pairings in α-Helices Vary with Length.

Cevdet Nacar

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cevdet NacarDepartment of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. cevnacar@marmara.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-8293-1495
Marmara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results of secondary structure prediction methods are widely used in applications in biotechnology and bioinformatics. However, the accuracy limit of these methods could be improved up to 92%. One approach to achieve this goal is to harvest information from the primary structure of the peptide. This study aims to contribute to this goal by investigating the variations in propensity of amino acid pairings to α-helices in globular proteins depending on helix length. (n):(n + 4) residue pairings were determined using a comprehensive peptide data set according to backbone hydrogen bond criterion which states that backbone hydrogen bond is the dominant driving force of protein folding. Helix length is limited to 13 to 26 residues. Findings of this study show that propensities of ALA:GLY and GLY:GLU pairings to α-helix in globular protein increase with increasing helix length but of ALA:ALA and ALA:VAL decrease. While the frequencies of ILE:ALA, LEU:ALA, LEU:GLN, LEU:GLU, LEU:LEU, MET:ILE and VAL:LEU pairings remain roughly constant with length, the 25 residue pairings have varying propensities in narrow helix lengths. The remaining pairings have no prominent propensity to α-helices.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsPeptidesAmino Acid SequencePeptide FragmentsProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Structure, SecondaryAmino AcidsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesHelix stabilityResidue pairingResidue propensitySecondary structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID36169766
OpenAlexW4297460626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.