ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2023
[Specially protected or stereotyped? How persons older than 65 years experienced the COVID-19 pandemic].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the COVID-19 pandemic, in Switzerland people aged 65+ years were categorized as a high-risk group, as they are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 due to higher rates of underlying health conditions. This focused attention on older adults, mostly with respect to frailty and helplessness. What is lacking is older adults' subjective views, including their state of mind and their experiences.
objectiveThis study explores the subjective view of older adults and aims to examine their everyday coping during the pandemic, particularly the concrete impacts on their lives, their self-assessment as a vulnerable group, and fears about COVID-19. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe longitudinal study was conducted from April to June 2020 using a mixed methods design comprising both closed and open-ended questions. We conducted guided biweekly interviews by telephone with 40 people (22 were women) aged 65-90 years. The quantitative data included descriptive analyses. The qualitative data were evaluated by structured content analysis with inductive category formation.
resultsThe respondents reported little change in their everyday lives. Overall, a good mood was reported. Social restrictions were experienced as a great burden. The respondents perceived their classification as a risk group as undifferentiated and arbitrary. Fear or worry about contracting the coronavirus was low. DISCUSSION: Respondents appear to have coped much better with the crisis than public discourse suggested. Activities and routines as well as support services may have been protective as strategies in everyday life. The homogeneous classification of older adults as an at-risk group ignores their resources and promotes both negative stereotypes and ageism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.