Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36169683›Full record

ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Assessment of an e‑learning platform for dermatosurgery].

Hanna Schneider, Corinne Hübers, Johannes Benecke, Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-Koch, Moritz Felcht

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanna SchneiderKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Exzellenzzentrum Dermatologie Mannheim des Landes Baden-Württemberg, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Corinne HübersKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Exzellenzzentrum Dermatologie Mannheim des Landes Baden-Württemberg, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Johannes BeneckeHautmedizin Kelkheim, Kelkheim, Deutschland.
Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-KochKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Exzellenzzentrum Dermatologie Mannheim des Landes Baden-Württemberg, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Moritz FelchtKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Exzellenzzentrum Dermatologie Mannheim des Landes Baden-Württemberg, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. Moritz.felcht@gmx.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDermatosurgical (DS) teaching is based on a combination of reading/understanding textbooks and applying surgical procedures (± supervision). Most textbooks are primarily text-centered. The text is visually supported by photos/sketches (S) and possibly videos (V). A learning goal of this teaching should be that the learner is confident to perform a procedure independently.

methodsWe have developed an online-based platform, the FlapFinder (FF; www.skin-surgery.org ), which teaches the user DS in the facial region primarily in the form of S + V. These are supported by a short text (T) and bonus material (B). B contains personal recommendations from the FF authors. A SurveyMonkey® (Survey Monkey, San Mateo, CA, USA) analysis should clarify how this is assessed by the user.

resultsIn all, 62 participants completed the questionnaire in full. This was a heterogeneous group (27 dermatologists vs. 35 non-dermatologists; 32 × clinic vs. 30 × non-clinic) with different prior experience. The majority of users found that the combination of T + S + V helped them to understand (55/62; 88.7%), remember (53/62, 85.5%), and perform the procedures independently (43/62; 69.3%). While S + V were most frequently used (22/62; 35.5% and 27/62; 43.6%), users reported having benefited most from this (20/62; 32.3% and 24/62; 38.7%), T + B were used less (0/62, 0.0% and 2/62; 3.2%). Nevertheless, the majority would not want to do without either S, V, T, or B (49/62; 79%).

conclusionThe combination of S + V + T + B is rated positively by DS learners. S + V are rated as particularly helpful. Future studies must clarify whether the learning objective of the concrete practical performance of DS is changed by e‑media.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionLearningPlastic Surgery ProceduresSurveys and QuestionnairesVideotape RecordingWound Closure TechniquesClosure techniquesDermato-oncologyMultimedia learningReconstructive surgeryTumor excision

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.