Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36169446›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2023

Alcohol minimum unit pricing and people experiencing homelessness: A qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives and experiences.

Elena D Dimova, Heather Strachan, Sarah Johnsen, Carol Emslie, Martin Whiteford, Robert Rush, Iain Smith, Tim Stockwell, Anne Whittaker, Lawrie Elliott

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Elena D DimovaGlasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3256-7170
Heather StrachanGlasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2232-5634
Sarah JohnsenHeriot-Watt University, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3307-6111
Carol EmslieGlasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2170-2039
Martin WhitefordGlasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-0309
Robert RushIndependent Consultant, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9314-8925
Iain SmithNHS Forth Valley, Scotland, UK.
Tim StockwellCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-6803
Anne WhittakerNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8960-5070
Lawrie ElliottGlasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-231X
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBHeriot-Watt University · GBNHS Forth Valley · GBOldham Council · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HIPS/18/43
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMinimum unit pricing (MUP) may reduce harmful drinking in the general population, but there is little evidence regarding its impact on marginalised groups. Our study is the first to explore the perceptions of MUP among stakeholders working with people experiencing homelessness following its introduction in Scotland in May 2018.

methodsQualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 41 professional stakeholders from statutory and third sector organisations across Scotland. We explored their views on MUP and its impact on people experiencing homelessness, service provision and implications for policy. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants suggested that the introduction of MUP in Scotland had negligible if any discernible impact on people experiencing homelessness and services that support them. Most service providers felt insufficiently informed about MUP prior to its implementation. Participants reported that where consequences for these populations were evident, they were primarily anticipated although some groups were negatively affected. People experiencing homelessness have complex needs in addition to alcohol addiction, and changes in the way services work need to be considered in future MUP-related discussions. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThis study suggests that despite initial concerns about potential unintended consequences of MUP, many of these did not materialise to the levels anticipated. As a population-level health policy, MUP is likely to have little beneficial impact on people experiencing homelessness without the provision of support to address their alcohol use and complex needs. The additional needs of certain groups (e.g., people with no recourse to public funds) need to be considered.

Indexed as

AlcoholismIll-Housed PersonsAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesCosts and Cost AnalysisHealth PolicyHumansalcoholhealth policyhomeless peopleminimum unit pricingScotland

Identifiers

PMID36169446
PMCPMC10087680
OpenAlexW4297463280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.