Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assays for the evaluation of T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 after symptomatic COVID-19.

introductionEvaluation of different cell-based assays for the study of adaptive immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for studying long-term and vaccine-induced immunity.

methodsEnzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) using peptide pools spanning the spike protein and nucleoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 were performed in 25 patients who recovered from paucisymptomatic (n = 19) or severe COVID-19 (n = 6).

resultsThe proportion of paucisymptomatic patients with detectable SARS-CoV-2 T cells was low, as only 44% exhibit a positive T cell response with the ICS and 67% with the ELISpot. The magnitude of SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses was low, both with ICS (median at 0.12% among total T cells) and ELISpot (median at 61 SFCs/million peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMC]) assays. Moreover, T cell responses in paucisymptomatic patients seemed lower than among patients with severe disease. In the paucisymptomatic patients, the two assays were well correlated with 76% of concordant responses and a Cohen's kappa of 55. Furthermore, in four patients SARS-CoV-2 T cells were detected by ELISpot but not with ICS. Short-term culture could improve the detection of specific T cells.

conclusionsIn patients who recovered from paucisymptomatic COVID-19, the proportion of detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 responses and their magnitude seemed lower than in patients with more severe symptoms. The ELISpot appeared to be more sensitive than the ICS assay. Short-term culture revealed that paucisymptomatic patients had nonetheless few SARS-CoV-2 T cells at a very low rate in peripheral blood. These data indicate that various ex-vivo assays may lead to different conclusions about the presence or absence of SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity.