Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36169237›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD): update 2023.

Allan Peter Davis, Thomas C Wiegers, Robin J Johnson, Daniela Sciaky, Jolene Wiegers, Carolyn J Mattingly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 454 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
454citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

454 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

394 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allan Peter DavisDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5741-7128
Thomas C WiegersDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Robin J JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Daniela SciakyDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Jolene WiegersDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Carolyn J MattinglyDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

Funding

The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)R01ES014065 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI DAVIS, ALLAN PETER, MATTINGLY, CAROLYN J. · 2006 to 2021
$10.5M
Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)U24ES033155 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Allan Peter Davis, Carolyn J. Mattingly · 2021 to 2026
$9.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014065NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES033155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD; http://ctdbase.org/) harmonizes cross-species heterogeneous data for chemical exposures and their biological repercussions by manually curating and interrelating chemical, gene, phenotype, anatomy, disease, taxa, and exposure content from the published literature. This curated information is integrated to generate inferences, providing potential molecular mediators to develop testable hypotheses and fill in knowledge gaps for environmental health. This dual nature, acting as both a knowledgebase and a discoverybase, makes CTD a unique resource for the scientific community. Here, we report a 20% increase in overall CTD content for 17 100 chemicals, 54 300 genes, 6100 phenotypes, 7270 diseases and 202 000 exposure statements. We also present CTD Tetramers, a novel tool that computationally generates four-unit information blocks connecting a chemical, gene, phenotype, and disease to construct potential molecular mechanistic pathways. Finally, we integrate terms for human biological media used in the CTD Exposure module to corresponding CTD Anatomy pages, allowing users to survey the chemical profiles for any tissue-of-interest and see how these environmental biomarkers are related to phenotypes for any anatomical site. These, and other webpage visual enhancements, continue to promote CTD as a practical, user-friendly, and innovative resource for finding information and generating testable hypotheses about environmental health.

Indexed as

ToxicogeneticsDatabases, FactualHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID36169237
PMCPMC9825590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.