Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36169208›Full record

ArticleChemSusChem2022

Sustainable Protein-Based Binder for Lithium-Sulfur Cathodes Processed by a Solvent-Free Dry-Coating Method.

Florian Schmidt, Sebastian Kirchhoff, Karin Jägle, Ankita De, Sebastian Ehrling, Paul Härtel, Susanne Dörfler, Thomas Abendroth, Benjamin Schumm, Holger Althues and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemSusChem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Dry Electrode Processing Technology and Binders.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anode Material Options Toward 500 Wh kgAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Florian SchmidtInorganic Chemistry I, Technical University Dresden, Bergstraße 66, 01069, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7965-6613
Sebastian KirchhoffInorganic Chemistry I, Technical University Dresden, Bergstraße 66, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Karin JägleChemical Surface and Battery Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology, Winterberg Straße 28, 01277, Dresden, Germany.
Ankita DeInorganic Chemistry I, Technical University Dresden, Bergstraße 66, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian EhrlingInorganic Chemistry I, Technical University Dresden, Bergstraße 66, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Paul HärtelChemical Surface and Battery Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology, Winterberg Straße 28, 01277, Dresden, Germany.
Susanne DörflerChemical Surface and Battery Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology, Winterberg Straße 28, 01277, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0142-4759
Thomas AbendrothChemical Surface and Battery Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology, Winterberg Straße 28, 01277, Dresden, Germany.
Benjamin SchummChemical Surface and Battery Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology, Winterberg Straße 28, 01277, Dresden, Germany.
Holger AlthuesChemical Surface and Battery Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology, Winterberg Straße 28, 01277, Dresden, Germany.
Stefan KaskelInorganic Chemistry I, Technical University Dresden, Bergstraße 66, 01069, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

Fraunhofer IWSGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 02P17E010German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 03XP0254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the market for next-generation energy storage, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) technology is one of the most promising candidates due to its high theoretical specific energy and cost-efficient ubiquitous active materials. In this study, this cell system was combined with a cost-efficient sustainable solvent-free electrode dry-coating process (DRYtraec®). So far, this process has been only feasible with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-based binders. To increase the sustainability of electrode processing and to decrease the undesired fluorine content of Li-S batteries, a renewable, biodegradable, and fluorine-free polypeptide was employed as a binder for solvent-free electrode manufacturing. The yielded sulfur/carbon dry-film cathodes were electrochemically evaluated under lean electrolyte conditions at coin and pouch cell level, using the state-of-the-art 1,2-dimethoxyethane/1,3-dioxolane electrolyte (DME/DOL) as well as the sparingly polysulfide-solvating electrolytes hexylmethylether (HME)/DOL and tetramethylene sulfone/1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether (TMS/TTE). These results demonstrated that the PTFE binder can be replaced by the biodegradable sericin as the cycle stability and performance of the cathodes was retained.

Indexed as

LithiumSulfurElectrodesElectrolytesPolytetrafluoroethyleneSolventsElectrolytesLithiumPolytetrafluoroethyleneSolventsSulfurelectrochemistryenergy storagelithium-sulfur batterysolvent-free processingsustainable binder

Identifiers

PMID36169208
PMCPMC9828167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.