Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168933›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022

Cervical pessary and cerclage placement for preterm birth prevention and cervicovaginal microbiome changes.

Mireia Vargas, Francisca Yañez, Andrea Elias, Andrea Bernabeu, Maria Goya, Zixuan Xie, Alba Farrás, Olga Sánchez, Zaida Soler, Carlos Blasquez and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mireia VargasDepartment of Obstetrics, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisca YañezMaternal and Child Health and Development Network (SAMID), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Andrea EliasMaternal and Child Health and Development Network (SAMID), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Andrea BernabeuDepartment of Obstetrics, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria GoyaDepartment of Obstetrics, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4001-2017
Zixuan XieMaternal and Child Health and Development Network (SAMID), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Alba FarrásDepartment of Obstetrics, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2100-7693
Olga SánchezMicrobiome Lab, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD); Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Zaida SolerMaternal and Child Health and Development Network (SAMID), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos BlasquezMaternal and Child Health and Development Network (SAMID), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Leonor ValleMaternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil de Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Anna OlivellaDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Begoña MuñozDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain.
Maia BrikDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1840-5087
Elena CarrerasDepartment of Obstetrics, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Chaysavanh ManichanhMaternal and Child Health and Development Network (SAMID), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Materno-Infantil · ESHospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus · ESUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur objective was to compare the vaginal microbiome in low-risk and high-risk pregnant women and to explore a potential association between vaginal microbiome and preterm birth. MATERIAL AND

methodsA pilot, consecutive, longitudinal, multicenter study was conducted in pregnant women at 18-22 weeks of gestation. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: control (normal cervix), pessary (cervical length ≤25 mm) and cerclage (cervical length ≤25 mm or history of preterm birth). Analysis and comparison of vaginal microbiota as a primary outcome was performed at inclusion and at 30 weeks of gestation, along with a follow-up of pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. We assessed the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women presenting a short cervix with that of pregnant women having a normal cervix, and compared the vaginal microbiome of women with a short cervix before and after placement of a cervical pessary or a cervical cerclage.

resultsThe microbiome of our control cohort was dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus and inners. Five community state types were identified and microbiome diversity did not change significantly over 10 weeks in controls. On the other hand, a short cervix was associated with a lower microbial load and higher microbial richness, and was not correlated with Lactobacillus relative abundance. After intervention, the cerclage group (n = 19) had a significant increase in microbial richness and a shift towards community state types driven by various bacterial species, including Lactobacillus mulieris, unidentified Bifidobacterium or Enterococcus. These changes were not significantly observed in the pessary (n = 26) and control (n = 35) groups. The cerclage group had more threatened preterm labor episodes and poorer outcomes than the control and pessary groups.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that a short cervix is associated with an altered vaginal microbiome community structure. The use of a cerclage for preterm birth prevention, as compared with a pessary, was associated with a microbial community harboring a relatively low abundance of Lactobacillus, with more threatened preterm labor episodes, and with poorer clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaObstetric Labor, PrematurePremature BirthCervical Length MeasurementCervix UteriFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPessariesPregnancy16S rRNA genecerclagecervical lengthcommunity state typemicrobial communitymicrobial diversitymicrobial richnesspessaryvaginal bacterial load

Identifiers

PMID36168933
PMCPMC9812209
OpenAlexW4297456976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.