ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2024
Complications Following Ulnar Artery Catheterization for Coronary Angiography.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrophysiological Assessment of Ulnar Nerve Function After Proximal and Distal Transulnar Coronary Angiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and management strategies for pseudoaneurysm of the ulnar artery: A scoping review.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUse of radial and ulnar access has increased due to its perceived benefits over femoral access. Ulnar artery catheterization can place patients at risk of significant complications, including pseudoaneurysm, expanding hematoma, compartment syndrome, ulnar nerve injury, and critical hand ischemia. The purpose of this study was to describe complications specific to ulnar artery catheterization.
methodsAfter obtaining institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent ulnar artery catheterization at our institution between 2019 and 2021. Complications were assessed, and complication rates were compared with previously published studies on ulnar artery catheterization for coronary angiography (percutaneous coronary intervention).
resultsA total of 41 patients were available for review with a mean age of 59 years. Of these, 17 patients (41%) sustained complications in the immediate postprocedural period. These complications included hematoma (12 patients, 29%), pseudoaneurysm (1 patient, 2%), ulnar artery thrombosis (1 patient, 2%), ulnar neuropathy (3 patients, 7%), arterial damage requiring repair (2 patients, 5%), transient ischemia (3 patients, 7%), and compartment syndrome (2 patients, 5%). Three of these patients (7%) required operative intervention, and several were admitted to the hospital for an additional period of observation.
conclusionsThis series highlights the significant risks associated with ulnar artery catheterization for percutaneous procedures. Complications include pseudoaneurysm, expanding hematoma, compartment syndrome, ulnar nerve damage, and critical hand ischemia. Several of these patients required urgent or emergent surgical intervention, with some patients experiencing ongoing ulnar nerve symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.