Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168561›Full record

ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2022

The prognostic effect of lymph node dissection in secondary lung tumor metastasectomies.

Salih Duman, Berk Çimenoğlu, Melike Ülker, Melek Ağkoç, Suat Erus, Berker Özkan, Murat Kara, Alper Toker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salih DumanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Berk ÇimenoğluDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Health Sciences University, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Melike ÜlkerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Melek AğkoçDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Suat ErusDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Berker ÖzkanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Murat KaraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Alper TokerDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, West Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of lymph node dissection in secondary lung tumor metastasectomies. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2015, a total of 201 patients (122 males, 79 females; mean age: of 41.4±19.2 years; range, 3 to 79 years) who had pulmonary metastasectomy due to colorectal carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and soft tissue - skeletal sarcomas were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological features of the patients, overall survival, and complication rates according to the presence of lymph node dissection were evaluated. Results: The most common histopathological subtype was a sarcoma in 118 (58.7%) patients, followed by colorectal carcinoma in 63 (31.3%) patients, and renal cell carcinoma in 20 (10%) patients. A total of 88 (43.7%) patients underwent systematic lymph node dissection with pulmonary metastasectomy. The mean overall survival of patients with and without lymph node dissection were 49±5.9 (95% confidence interval 37.3-60.6) and 26±4.4 (95% confidence interval 17.2-34.7) months, respectively (p=0.003). The five-year survival rates in colorectal carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma were 52%, 30%, and 23%, respectively (p=0.002). Locoregional recurrences occurred in 15 (35.7%) patients in the lymph node dissection group and in 23 (60.5%) patients in the non-lymph node dissection group (p=0.026). Lymph node dissection did not show a significant relationship regarding to postoperative complications (p=0.09). Conclusion: Lymph node dissection following pulmonary metastasectomy may improve the overall survival and reduce locoregional recurrence, without any increase in morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Colorectal carcinomalymph node dissectionpulmonary metastasectomyrenal cell carcinomasarcoma

Identifiers

PMID36168561
PMCPMC9473603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.