Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168537›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2022

Practical tips for teaching ethics and humanism to medical students.

Katharine R Meacham, Ira Sloan, Robyn A Latessa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katharine R MeachamMountain Area Health Education Center, UNC School of Medicine, Asheville campus, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8065-6664
Ira SloanMountain Area Health Education Center, UNC School of Medicine, Asheville campus, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA.
Robyn A LatessaMountain Area Health Education Center, UNC School of Medicine, Asheville campus, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-1805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents the results of a decade's experiment in creating a longitudinal ethics and humanism curriculum for the core clinical year at UNC School of Medicine, North Carolina, United States. This curriculum applies published research on best practices in medical ethics education. Sample comments from course evaluations of the students who have completed this curriculum provide support for its success at achieving its desired learning outcomes. To create a similar ethics curriculum in the core clinical year at other medical schools, there are twelve practical tips:  preparation: read the research on the ethical challenges for medical students; recruit an interdisciplinary teaching team; create cohorts for this aspect of the curriculum that will stay together for the year; grade only with pass/fail; have the students bring the cases from their clinical experiences; feed them if possible, and structure the time together carefully. Use a narrative ethics methodology and introduce alternative methods for student writing and group process. Connect students with literature in medical humanities and bioethics and encourage publication of their narratives. As with any good creation, the whole is more than the sum of its parts, and each campus can adapt these guidelines for their people and programs.

Indexed as

bioethicsclinical clerkshipsclinical ethicshumanism in medicinemedical educationmedical ethicsmedical school curriculumnarrative ethics

Identifiers

PMID36168537
PMCPMC9370080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.