ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2021
Experiences in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): Barriers and challenges from the front lines.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicentre insights into OPAT: a comprehensive analysis of Türkiye's unstructured system.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile of Vancomycin in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Services: A Systematic Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Discharge Delays and Costs Associated With Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Deciding on the location for receiving parenteral antimicrobial therapy: development and preliminary testing of a patient decision aid.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Current practices in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programmes: an international multi-centre survey.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- Review
- Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Review
- Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) across the world: a comparative analysis-what lessons can we learn?JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024Review
- Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in a Safety Net Hospital: Opportunities for Improvement.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- IVsight as an Infusion Monitor for Patients Receiving Intravenous Therapy: An Exploratory, Unblinded, Single-Center Trial.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2024Article
- Usefulness of Routine Laboratory Tests for Follow up of Patients Receiving Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Run by Infectious Diseases Fellows.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Outcomes among patients withAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022Article
- Assessment of risk factors associated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) complications: A retrospective cohort study.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022Article
- The State of the Globe: Unlocking Hospital Beds without Unlocking Harm.Journal of global infectious diseasesArticle
- The Right Patient at the Right Place: A Quality Improvement Initiative Implementing Safe Dehospitalization of Patients Using Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.Journal of global infectious diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is now the standard of care for managing patients who no longer need inpatient care but require prolonged intravenous antimicrobial therapy. OPAT increases patient satisfaction, reduces the lengths of hospital stay, lowers emergency department readmission rates, and decreases total healthcare spending. Objective: To investigate Virginia Commonwealth University Health System's experience with OPAT and to highlight the obstacles patients and clinicians face when navigating and utilizing this program. Design: We conducted this descriptive study at a large, academic, tertiary-care hospital in Central Virginia. Methods: We performed manual reviews of electronic medical records of 602 patient, and we evaluated the records of those receiving OPAT between 2017 and 2020. Reviews included antimicrobial agents, diagnoses requiring OPAT, adverse effects related to antimicrobials, adverse effects related to peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC), readmission rate, discharge destination, and death. We evaluated our program with descriptive statistics. Results: Among 602 patients who received OPAT, most were diagnosed with bacteremia or musculoskeletal infections. Patients were either discharged home or to another healthcare facility, with the former comprising most of the rehospitalizations. Ertapenem and vancomycin were associated with the most adverse drug events among our cohort. Elevated transaminase levels were noted in 23% of patients. The rate of PICC-line adverse events in this study population was 0.05%. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the barriers and challenges that patients and providers face when receiving OPAT, and they can inform efforts to improve patient clinical outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.