Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168502›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2021

Experiences in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): Barriers and challenges from the front lines.

Nicole Ng, Pamela Bailey, Rachel Pryor, Lillian Fung, Christine Veals, Kenneth Sabouri, Julie Reznicek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Outcomes among patients withAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicole NgVirginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9488-6970
Pamela BaileyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-8955
Rachel PryorHospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9567-8778
Lillian FungVirginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
Christine VealsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia.
Kenneth SabouriOption Care Health, Ashland, Virginia.
Julie ReznicekDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is now the standard of care for managing patients who no longer need inpatient care but require prolonged intravenous antimicrobial therapy. OPAT increases patient satisfaction, reduces the lengths of hospital stay, lowers emergency department readmission rates, and decreases total healthcare spending. Objective: To investigate Virginia Commonwealth University Health System's experience with OPAT and to highlight the obstacles patients and clinicians face when navigating and utilizing this program. Design: We conducted this descriptive study at a large, academic, tertiary-care hospital in Central Virginia. Methods: We performed manual reviews of electronic medical records of 602 patient, and we evaluated the records of those receiving OPAT between 2017 and 2020. Reviews included antimicrobial agents, diagnoses requiring OPAT, adverse effects related to antimicrobials, adverse effects related to peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC), readmission rate, discharge destination, and death. We evaluated our program with descriptive statistics. Results: Among 602 patients who received OPAT, most were diagnosed with bacteremia or musculoskeletal infections. Patients were either discharged home or to another healthcare facility, with the former comprising most of the rehospitalizations. Ertapenem and vancomycin were associated with the most adverse drug events among our cohort. Elevated transaminase levels were noted in 23% of patients. The rate of PICC-line adverse events in this study population was 0.05%. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the barriers and challenges that patients and providers face when receiving OPAT, and they can inform efforts to improve patient clinical outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID36168502
PMCPMC9495526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.