Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168480›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2021

A modified Delphi approach to develop a trial protocol for antibiotic de-escalation in patients with suspected sepsis.

Michael E Yarrington, Rebekah W Moehring, Michael Z David, Keith W Hamilton, Michael Klompas, Chanu Rhee, Kevin Hsueh, Elizabeth Dodds Ashley, Ronda L Sinkowitz-Cochran, Matthew Ryan and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03517007 (The DETOURS Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03517007 nacompletednot on this map

The DETOURS Trial: De-escalating Empiric Treatment: Opting Out of Rx for Selected Patients With Suspected Sepsis - Opt-Out Protocol Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled762ConditionsAntibiotic StewardshipArmsOpt-Out Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michael E YarringtonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-1519
Rebekah W MoehringDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael Z DavidDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Keith W HamiltonDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael KlompasDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chanu RheeDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kevin HsuehDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Elizabeth Dodds AshleyDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.
Ronda L Sinkowitz-CochranDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Matthew RyanDuke Center for Healthcare Safety and Quality, Durham, North Carolina.
Deverick J AndersonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.
DETOURS Expert Panel of the CDC Prevention Epicenters Program

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early administration of antibiotics in sepsis is associated with improved patient outcomes, but safe and generalizable approaches to de-escalate or discontinue antibiotics after suspected sepsis events are unknown. Methods: We used a modified Delphi approach to identify safety criteria for an opt-out protocol to guide de-escalation or discontinuation of antibiotic therapy after 72 hours in non-ICU patients with suspected sepsis. An expert panel with expertise in antimicrobial stewardship and hospital epidemiology rated 48 unique criteria across 3 electronic survey rating tools. Criteria were rated primarily based on their impact on patient safety and feasibility for extraction from electronic health record review. The 48 unique criteria were rated by anonymous electronic survey tools, and the results were fed back to the expert panel participants. Consensus was achieved to either retain or remove each criterion. Results: After 3 rounds, 22 unique criteria remained as part of the opt-out safety checklist. These criteria included high-risk comorbidities, signs of severe illness, lack of cultures during sepsis work-up or antibiotic use prior to blood cultures, or ongoing signs and symptoms of infection. Conclusions: The modified Delphi approach is a useful method to achieve expert-level consensus in the absence of evidence suifficient to provide validated guidance. The Delphi approach allowed for flexibility in development of an opt-out trial protocol for sepsis antibiotic de-escalation. The utility of this protocol should be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

antimicrobial stewardshipmodified Delphipatient safetyprotocol developmentSepsis

Identifiers

PMID36168480
PMCPMC9495406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.