Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168466›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2021

Social media: A new tool for outbreak surveillance.

Averi E Wilson, Christoph U Lehmann, Sameh N Saleh, John Hanna, Richard J Medford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Averi E WilsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7309-7435
Christoph U LehmannDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-4646
Sameh N SalehDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-1659
John HannaClinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Richard J MedfordClinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9814-8043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media platforms allow users to share news, ideas, thoughts, and opinions on a global scale. Data processing methods allow researchers to automate the collection and interpretation of social media posts for efficient and valuable disease surveillance. Data derived from social media and internet search trends have been used successfully for monitoring and forecasting disease outbreaks such as Zika, Dengue, MERS, and Ebola viruses. More recently, data derived from social media have been used to monitor and model disease incidence during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We discuss the use of social media for disease surveillance.

Identifiers

PMID36168466
PMCPMC9495414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.