Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168453›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2021

The short-term effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among healthcare workers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Alexandre R Marra, Takaaki Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, Bruna Marques Tofaneto, Luigi Makowski Bariani, Mariana de Amorim Auler, Jorge L Salinas, Michael B Edmond, João Renato Rebello Pinho and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexandre R MarraDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-7688
Takaaki KobayashiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Hiroyuki SuzukiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Mohammed AlsuhaibaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Bruna Marques TofanetoAlbert Einstein Medical College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luigi Makowski BarianiAlbert Einstein Medical College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana de Amorim AulerAlbert Einstein Medical College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge L SalinasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Michael B EdmondWest Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
João Renato Rebello PinhoSpecial Techniques Laboratory, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Vicente RizzoInstituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marin L SchweizerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of COVID-19 due to high levels of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Thus, effective vaccines are needed. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on COVID-19 short-term vaccine effectiveness among HCWs. Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from December 2019 to June 11, 2021, for studies evaluating vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 among HCWs. To meta-analyze the extracted data, we calculated the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for COVID-19 between vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated as 100% × (1 - DOR). We also performed a stratified analysis for vaccine effectiveness by vaccination status: 1 dose and 2 doses of the vaccine. Results: We included 13 studies, including 173,742 HCWs evaluated for vaccine effectiveness in the meta-analysis. The vast majority (99.9%) of HCWs were vaccinated with the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The pooled DOR for symptomatic COVID-19 among vaccinated HCWs was 0.072 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.028-0.184) with an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 92.8% (95% CI, 81.6%-97.2%). In stratified analyses, the estimated vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 among HCWs who had received 1 dose of vaccine was 82.1% (95% CI, 46.1%-94.1%) and the vaccine effectiveness among HCWs who had received 2 doses was 93.5% (95% CI, 82.5%-97.6%). Conclusions: The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are highly effective against symptomatic COVID-19, even with 1 dose. More observational studies are needed to evaluate the vaccine effectiveness of other COVID-19 vaccines, COVID-19 breakthrough after vaccination, and vaccine efficacy against new variants.

Identifiers

PMID36168453
PMCPMC9495770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.