ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022
Meta-analysis of seroprevalence and zoonotic infections of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): A one-health perspective.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Could be a Priority Pathogen to Cause Public Health Emergency: Noticeable Features and Counteractive Measures.Environmental health insights · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The zoonotic Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is caused by an emerging beta-coronavirus (CoV). The majority of MERS studies have included scattered data from sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, and these data have not been analyzed collectively. In this work, a meta-analysis of these studies was conducted to coalesce these results, determine the prevalence and seroprevalence of MERS-CoV in camels and humans, and examine how zoonotic infection rates in dromedary camels are related to human infection rates. After extracting the collected data, the prevalence and seroprevalence at a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis was conducted. Thirteen studies were included. Eight studies included 2905 samples from dromedary camels, of which 1108 (38.14%) were positive for the virus. The prevalence was 8.75[-13.47, 30.98] at 95% CI in dromedary camels and 0.03[-35.23, 35.28] at 95% CI in humans. Ten studies included 7176 serum samples, 5788 (80.66%) of which were positive. The seroprevalence was 20.69[-4.60, 45.99] at 95% CI. The prevalence of MERS-CoV was moderate to high, but the seroprevalence was high. Despite the high prevalence of the virus in camel herds, zoonotic transmissions were not widespread. Further longitudinal and cross-sectional follow-up studies are recommended to provide solid control of MERS-CoV transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.