Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168434›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Six-minute rowing test: a valid and reliable method for assessing power output in amateur male rowers.

Álvaro Huerta Ojeda, Miguel Riquelme Guerra, Walter Coronado Román, María-Mercedes Yeomans-Cabrera, Rodrigo Fuentes-Kloss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Evaluation of Physical Performance in Rowing Ergometer: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Álvaro Huerta OjedaNúcleo de Investigación en Salud, Actividad Física y Deporte ISAFYD, Universidad de Las Americas, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Miguel Riquelme GuerraMagíster Medicina y Ciencias del Deporte, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Walter Coronado RománFacultad de Educación Física y Deporte, Escuela Naval "Arturo Prat", Valparaíso, Chile.
María-Mercedes Yeomans-CabreraFacultad de Educación, Universidad de Las Americas, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Rodrigo Fuentes-KlossDepartamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Standardized tests are currently available to assess power output in elite rowers. However, there are no valid and reliable tests to assess power output in amateur rowers. Objective: This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of a 6-min rowing ergometer test (6-min Methods: Twelve male amateur rowers were part of the study. All participants were instructed to perform an incremental test (IT), a 6-min Results: There was no significant difference in VO Conclusion: From a ventilatory and mechanical point of view, the 6-min

Indexed as

Oxygen ConsumptionWater SportsErgometryHumansMaleOxygenReproducibility of ResultsOxygenAmateur rowersPower outputReliabilityRowingValidity

Identifiers

PMID36168434
PMCPMC9509676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.