ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022
Vaginal leiomyoma: A case report.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vesicovaginal Leiomyoma at 20 Years of Age-A Rare Clinical Entity: Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Vaginal leiomyoma: a rare vaginal tumor.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaginal leiomyomas are rare and only a small number of cases have been reported in the literature. Due to the rarity of the disease and complexity of the vaginal anatomy, definitive diagnosis and treatment are challenging. A 48-year-old female patient presented with a vaginal mass and urinary incontinence. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a clear tumor measuring 65x46 mm in diameter at the anterior vaginal wall. Intraoperatively, frozen-section analysis was performed to confirm that the tumor was benign. The tumor was resected using the transvaginal approach. The patient recovered well without any complications. The pathological diagnosis was leiomyoma. The present case suggests that intraoperative frozen-section analysis should be performed in all patients with vaginal wall tumors with MRI findings suggestive of malignancy, and surgical treatment should be performed once the diagnosis is confirmed to prevent misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.