Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168402›Full record

ArticleBurns & trauma2022

Early prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin alleviates mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective analysis from the MIMIC-IV database.

Zhi-Ye Zou, Jia-Jia Huang, Ying-Yi Luan, Zhen-Jia Yang, Zhi-Peng Zhou, Jing-Jing Zhang, Yong-Ming Yao, Ming Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns & trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhi-Ye ZouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Hospital Infection Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital & First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China.
Jia-Jia HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Hospital Infection Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital & First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China.
Ying-Yi LuanDepartment of Central Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100026, China.
Zhen-Jia YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Hospital Infection Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital & First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China.
Zhi-Peng ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Hospital Infection Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital & First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China.
Jing-Jing ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Hospital Infection Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital & First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China.
Yong-Ming YaoTrauma Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Department and Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Ming WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Hospital Infection Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital & First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0800-5506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Minimal data exist on anticoagulation use and timing and the dose of heparin in patients with sepsis, and whether heparin use improves sepsis survival remains largely unclear. This study was performed to assess whether heparin administration would provide a survival advantage in critically ill patients with sepsis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was conducted. Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to evaluate the outcomes of prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin administered by subcutaneous injection within 48 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 60-day mortality, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) on day 7. E-Value analysis were used for unmeasured confounding. Results: A total of 6646 adult septic patients were included and divided into an early prophylactic heparin group ( Conclusions: This study found an association between early administration prophylactic heparin provided to patients with sepsis and reduced risk-adjusted mortality. A prospective randomized-controlled study should be designed to further assess the relevant findings.

Indexed as

Critically ill patientsEarly prophylactic anticoagulationHeparinMortalitySepsis

Identifiers

PMID36168402
PMCPMC9501718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.