ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2021
Non-transfer Deep Learning of Optical Coherence Tomography for Post-hoc Explanation of Macular Disease Classification.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- RobOCTNet: Robotics and Deep Learning for Referable Posterior Segment Pathology Detection in an Emergency Department Population.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Multi-Fundus Diseases Classification Using Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Images with Swin Transformer V2.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Perturbation of deep autoencoder weights for model compression and classification of tabular data.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep transfer learning is a popular choice for classifying monochromatic medical images using models that are pretrained by natural images with color channels. This choice may introduce unnecessarily redundant model complexity that can limit explanations of such model behavior and outcomes in the context of medical imaging. To investigate this hypothesis, we develop a configurable deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify four macular disease conditions using retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Our proposed non-transfer deep CNN model (acc: 97.9%) outperforms existing transfer learning models such as ResNet-50 (acc: 89.0%), ResNet-101 (acc: 96.7%), VGG-19 (acc: 93.3%), Inception-V3 (acc: 95.8%) in the same retinal OCT image classification task. We perform post-hoc analysis of the trained model and model extracted image features, which reveals that only eight out of 256 filter kernels are active at our final convolutional layer. The convolutional responses of these selective eight filters yield image features that efficiently separate four macular disease classes even when projected onto two-dimensional principal component space. Our findings suggest that many deep learning parameters and their computations are redundant and expensive for retinal OCT image classification, which are expected to be more intense when using transfer learning. Additionally, we provide clinical interpretations of our misclassified test images identifying manifest artifacts, shadowing of useful texture, false texture representing fluids, and other confounding factors. These clinical explanations along with model optimization via kernel selection can improve the classification accuracy, computational costs, and explainability of model outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.