Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168324›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2021

Non-transfer Deep Learning of Optical Coherence Tomography for Post-hoc Explanation of Macular Disease Classification.

Raisul Arefin, Manar D Samad, Furkan A Akyelken, Arash Davanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perturbation of deep autoencoder weights for model compression and classification of tabular data.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raisul ArefinDept. of Computer Science Auburn University Auburn, AB USA.
Manar D SamadDept. of Computer Science Tennessee State University Nashville, TN USA.
Furkan A AkyelkenDept. of Computer Science Tennessee State University Nashville, TN, USA.
Arash DavanianVanderbilt Eye Institute Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Optimizing the Utility of Large Electronic Health Records Data in Data-Driven Health ResearchR15LM013569 · NLM · TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMAD, MANAR · 2020 to 2020
$422k
NLM NIH HHS R15 LM013569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep transfer learning is a popular choice for classifying monochromatic medical images using models that are pretrained by natural images with color channels. This choice may introduce unnecessarily redundant model complexity that can limit explanations of such model behavior and outcomes in the context of medical imaging. To investigate this hypothesis, we develop a configurable deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify four macular disease conditions using retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Our proposed non-transfer deep CNN model (acc: 97.9%) outperforms existing transfer learning models such as ResNet-50 (acc: 89.0%), ResNet-101 (acc: 96.7%), VGG-19 (acc: 93.3%), Inception-V3 (acc: 95.8%) in the same retinal OCT image classification task. We perform post-hoc analysis of the trained model and model extracted image features, which reveals that only eight out of 256 filter kernels are active at our final convolutional layer. The convolutional responses of these selective eight filters yield image features that efficiently separate four macular disease classes even when projected onto two-dimensional principal component space. Our findings suggest that many deep learning parameters and their computations are redundant and expensive for retinal OCT image classification, which are expected to be more intense when using transfer learning. Additionally, we provide clinical interpretations of our misclassified test images identifying manifest artifacts, shadowing of useful texture, false texture representing fluids, and other confounding factors. These clinical explanations along with model optimization via kernel selection can improve the classification accuracy, computational costs, and explainability of model outcomes.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkExplainable AIFeature extractionFilter kernelsMacular diseaseMedical imagingOphthalmology

Identifiers

PMID36168324
PMCPMC9511893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.