ArticleOncology letters2022
Local recurrence for phyllodes tumours of the breast: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synchronous bilateral phyllodes tumors with discordant grades and false-positive axillaryFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The Challenges of Approaching a Giant Breast Mass: A Case Report With Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the present systematic review was the determination of methodologies preferable for treating phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast and whether the malignancy of the tumor is of significance to the selected treatment. In addition, to investigate if local recurrence (LR) within patients is different based on the therapeutic approach followed by the physician. All studies were gathered by utilization of the biggest online medical databases in the world including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Due to the specificity of the study, the resultant set of studies included in the present analysis was not large. All included studies had to refer to patients diagnosed with PTs of the breast, include the malignancy of the tumor and the preferred treatment. Moreover, they included a reference to LR post-treatment, even if there wasn't any. The age range of patients was 20-55 years old and follow-ups should have been performed. As a result, from the initial 484 studies gathered and after proper and thorough evaluation, only 10 were of significance. The studies appeared heterogeneous in terms of population, topology, treatment methodology, additional therapeutic approaches, LR rate, age and follow-up periods. Overall, excisions were used for non-malignant tumors while mastectomy was preferable for tumors with malignancy. Radiotherapy was used both as an additional treatment for tumors and LR. Also, it was revealed that LR varied based on the malignancy and treatment methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.