ArticleBiophysical journal2022
Optimal transcriptional regulation of dynamic bacterial responses to sudden drug exposures.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct Quantification of Protein-Protein Interactions in Living Bacterial Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Drug delivery dynamics dictate evolution of bacterial antibiotic responses.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Dynamics of drug delivery determines course of evolution of antibiotic responses in bacteria.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular responses to the presence of toxic compounds in their environment require prompt expression of the correct levels of the appropriate enzymes, which are typically regulated by transcription factors that control gene expression for the duration of the response. The characteristics of each response dictate the choice of regulatory parameters such as the affinity of the transcription factor to its binding sites and the strength of the promoters it regulates. Although much is known about the dynamics of cellular responses, we still lack a framework to understand how different regulatory strategies evolved in natural systems relate to the selective pressures acting in each particular case. Here, we analyze a dynamical model of a typical antibiotic response in bacteria, where a transcriptionally repressed enzyme is induced by a sudden exposure to the drug that it processes. We identify strategies of gene regulation that optimize this response for different types of selective pressures, which we define as a set of costs associated with the drug, enzyme, and repressor concentrations during the response. We find that regulation happens in a limited region of the regulatory parameter space. While responses to more costly (toxic) drugs favor the usage of strongly self-regulated repressors, responses where expression of enzyme is more costly favor the usage of constitutively expressed repressors. Only a very narrow range of selective pressures favor weakly self-regulated repressors. We use this framework to determine which costs and benefits are most critical for the evolution of a variety of natural cellular responses that satisfy the approximations in our model and to analyze how regulation is optimized in new environments with different demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.