Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168120›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Communication in home care-A feasibility study of an educational intervention in self-efficacy and job satisfaction.

Tanja Gustafsson, Annelie J Sundler, Lena Hedén, Elisabeth Lindberg, Hanna Maurin Söderholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanja GustafssonFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8379-7910
Annelie J SundlerFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9194-3244
Lena HedénFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7067-2687
Elisabeth LindbergFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7488-4038
Hanna Maurin SöderholmFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0279-8987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the feasibility of evaluating a novel educational intervention on person-centered communication for nursing assistants (NAs) in home care.

designA feasibility study with pre- and post-assessments.

methodsFeasibility was assessed pre- and post-intervention, including evaluation of data collection procedures, completion rates and missing data in two questionnaires: Self-efficacy Questionnaire measuring communication skills and Measure of Job Satisfaction, analysed descriptively and statistically.

resultsThe questionnaires were feasible and acceptable for the NAs to complete and understand. The pre- and post-assessments showed 83% and 61% completion rates, respectively, and a low proportion of missing data. Barriers for not participating in data collection were stress caused by staff shortages and high workload. Preliminary analysis of the questionnaires showed no significant difference pre- and post-intervention, even though an overall tendency of increased communication self-efficacy was observed. The NAs' self-efficacy ratings also revealed a ceiling effect.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesJob SatisfactionCommunicationFeasibility StudiesHumansNursing HomesSelf EfficacySurveys and Questionnairescommunicationevaluationfeasibilityhome careinterventionjob satisfactionself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID36168120
PMCPMC9912385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.