ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
An explainable machine learning method for assessing surgical skill in liposuction surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Stream and Cross-Channel Attention Networks for Surgical Skill Classification in Open Surgery From Hand Kinematics.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Cannula Kinematics in Liposuction Surgical Procedures Using a Marker-Based Tracking System.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Towards accurate and interpretable competency-based assessment: enhancing clinical competency assessment through multimodal AI and anomaly detection.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning using EMG and accelerometer sensor data quantifies surgical skill and identifies biomarkers of expertise.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence integration in surgery through hand and instrument tracking: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSurgical skill assessment has received growing interest in surgery training and quality control due to its essential role in competency assessment and trainee feedback. However, the current assessment methods rarely provide corresponding feedback guidance while giving ability evaluation. We aim to validate an explainable surgical skill assessment method that automatically evaluates the trainee performance of liposuction surgery and provides visual postoperative and real-time feedback.
methodsIn this study, machine learning using a model-agnostic interpretable method based on stroke segmentation was introduced to objectively evaluate surgical skills. We evaluated the method on liposuction surgery datasets that consisted of motion and force data for classification tasks.
resultsOur classifier achieved optimistic accuracy in clinical and imitation liposuction surgery models, ranging from 89 to 94%. With the help of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), we deeply explore the potential rules of liposuction operation between surgeons with variant experiences and provide real-time feedback based on the ML model to surgeons with undesirable skills.
conclusionOur results demonstrate the strong abilities of explainable machine learning methods in objective surgical skill assessment. We believe that the machine learning model based on interpretive methods proposed in this article can improve the evaluation and training of liposuction surgery and provide objective assessment and training guidance for other surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36167953What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.