Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167953›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

An explainable machine learning method for assessing surgical skill in liposuction surgery.

Sutuke Yibulayimu, Yuneng Wang, Yanzhen Liu, Zhibin Sun, Yu Wang, Haiyue Jiang, Facheng Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cross-Stream and Cross-Channel Attention Networks for Surgical Skill Classification in Open Surgery From Hand Kinematics.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sutuke YibulayimuSchool of Biomedical Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yuneng WangCenter of Body Contouring and Liposuction Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yanzhen LiuSchool of Biomedical Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Zhibin SunSchool of Biomedical Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yu WangSchool of Biomedical Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China. wangyu@buaa.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-6465
Haiyue JiangCenter of Body Contouring and Liposuction Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Facheng LiCenter of Body Contouring and Liposuction Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2018-1-4041Peking Union Medical College Graduate Student Innovation Fund 100232 01800402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical skill assessment has received growing interest in surgery training and quality control due to its essential role in competency assessment and trainee feedback. However, the current assessment methods rarely provide corresponding feedback guidance while giving ability evaluation. We aim to validate an explainable surgical skill assessment method that automatically evaluates the trainee performance of liposuction surgery and provides visual postoperative and real-time feedback.

methodsIn this study, machine learning using a model-agnostic interpretable method based on stroke segmentation was introduced to objectively evaluate surgical skills. We evaluated the method on liposuction surgery datasets that consisted of motion and force data for classification tasks.

resultsOur classifier achieved optimistic accuracy in clinical and imitation liposuction surgery models, ranging from 89 to 94%. With the help of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), we deeply explore the potential rules of liposuction operation between surgeons with variant experiences and provide real-time feedback based on the ML model to surgeons with undesirable skills.

conclusionOur results demonstrate the strong abilities of explainable machine learning methods in objective surgical skill assessment. We believe that the machine learning model based on interpretive methods proposed in this article can improve the evaluation and training of liposuction surgery and provide objective assessment and training guidance for other surgeries.

Indexed as

LipectomySurgeonsClinical CompetenceFeedbackHumansMachine LearningInterpretable machine learningLiposuction surgeryObjective skill assessmentSurgical educationSurgical motion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.