Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167934›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2022

The detection and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum-like 1, A. ovis and A. capra in sheep: A. capra divides into two genogroups.

Kursat Altay, Ufuk Erol, Omer Faruk Sahin, Ayperi Aytmirzakizi, Ethem Mutlu Temizel, Mehmet Fatih Aydin, Nazir Dumanli, Munir Aktas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anaplasma capra: a new emerging tick-borne zoonotic pathogen.Veterinary research communications · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. First Molecular Evidence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kursat AltayDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58140, Sivas, Türkiye, Turkey. kaltay@cumhuriyet.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-1239
Ufuk ErolDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58140, Sivas, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6766-1335
Omer Faruk SahinDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58140, Sivas, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3230-504X
Ayperi AytmirzakiziFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, 720044, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3363-0941
Ethem Mutlu TemizelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, 16059, Bursa, TÜRKİYE, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4828-4116
Mehmet Fatih AydinDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, 70100, Karaman, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8325-4887
Nazir DumanliDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-8210
Munir AktasDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3188-8757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the presence, prevalence, and genotypes of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, A. ovis, and A. capra in sheep were investigated based on 16 S SSU rRNA, groEL, and gtlA gene-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively. The sequences of the genes were used for detection of the phylogenetic position of the species. Additionally, a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) were carried out for discrimination of A. phagocytophilum and related variants (A. phagocytophilum-like 1 and 2). The prevalence of Anaplasma spp. was found as 25.8% (101/391), while it was found that A. ovis, A. phagocytophilum-like 1, and A. capra are circulating in the sheep herds in Kyrgyzstan, according to the PCRs, RFLP and the partial DNA sequencing results. The positivity rates of A. phagocytophilum-like 1, A. ovis, and A. capra genotype-1 were 6.9, 22.5, and 5.3%, respectively. A total of 32 (8.2%) sheep were found to be mix infected. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses and sequence comparison with those available in the GenBank showed that A. capra formed two distinct genetic groups (A. capra genotype-1 and A. capra genotype-2). Considering the zoonotic potential of these species, it may be necessary to make changes in the interpretation of anaplasmosis cases in animals and there is a need for further studies to determine the pathogenicity of the species/genotypes circulating in animals.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumPhylogenyAnimalsGenotypeGoatsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSheepRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S SSU rRNAAnaplasma capra genotypesAnaplasma speciesgroELgtlASheep

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.