Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167866›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023

Analysis for Predictors of Failure of Orthodontic Mini-implant Using Patient-Specific Finite Element Models.

Takahiro Toriya, Toru Kitahara, Hiroto Hyakutake, Mitsugu Todo, Ichiro Takahashi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Development and in vitro testing of an orthodontic miniscrew for use in the mandible.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Simulation and validation of spinal construct testing based on ASTM F1717.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takahiro ToriyaSection of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Toru KitaharaSection of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Hiroto HyakutakeGraduate School of Information Sciences, Hiroshima City University, 3-4-1, Ozuka-Higashi, Asa-Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 731-3194, Japan.
Mitsugu TodoResearch Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga-koen, Kasuga, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan.
Ichiro TakahashiSection of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. takahashi@dent.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Kyushu University · JPHiroshima City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the clinical factors and mechanical parameters for predicting orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) failure in the mandible, which has different properties from the maxilla. A patient-specific finite element analysis was applied to 32 OMIs (6 failures and 26 successes) implanted between the mandibular second premolars and first molars used for anchorage. The peak stress and strain parameters were calculated for each sample. A logistic regression of the failure (vs. success) of OMIs on the mechanical parameters in the models was conducted. In addition, the influence of clinical factors on the mechanical parameters considered to be related to OMI failure was examined by a regression analysis. The mechanical parameter which best predicts OMI failure in the mandible was found to be a minimum principal strain of between 0.5 to 1.0 mm from the OMI surface (R

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresBone DensityEquipment FailureFinite Element AnalysisHumansDental ImplantsAnchorageAngulation of mini-implantBone densityOrthodontic treatmentRoot distance

Identifiers

PMID36167866
OpenAlexW4297340145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.