Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167846›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

Pan-tumor CAnine cuTaneous Cancer Histology (CATCH) dataset.

Frauke Wilm, Marco Fragoso, Christian Marzahl, Jingna Qiu, Chloé Puget, Laura Diehl, Christof A Bertram, Robert Klopfleisch, Andreas Maier, Katharina Breininger and 1 more

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial intelligence predictsVeterinary pathology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review of Molecular Technologies for Investigating Canine Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Frauke WilmPattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. frauke.wilm@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9065-0554
Marco FragosoInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian MarzahlPattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-9873
Jingna QiuDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-9670
Chloé PugetInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Laura DiehlInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christof A BertramInstitute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-9997
Robert KlopfleischInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-0568
Andreas MaierPattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9550-5284
Katharina BreiningerDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-5869
Marc AubrevilleTechnische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-5247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to morphological similarities, the differentiation of histologic sections of cutaneous tumors into individual subtypes can be challenging. Recently, deep learning-based approaches have proven their potential for supporting pathologists in this regard. However, many of these supervised algorithms require a large amount of annotated data for robust development. We present a publicly available dataset of 350 whole slide images of seven different canine cutaneous tumors complemented by 12,424 polygon annotations for 13 histologic classes, including seven cutaneous tumor subtypes. In inter-rater experiments, we show a high consistency of the provided labels, especially for tumor annotations. We further validate the dataset by training a deep neural network for the task of tissue segmentation and tumor subtype classification. We achieve a class-averaged Jaccard coefficient of 0.7047, and 0.9044 for tumor in particular. For classification, we achieve a slide-level accuracy of 0.9857. Since canine cutaneous tumors possess various histologic homologies to human tumors the added value of this dataset is not limited to veterinary pathology but extends to more general fields of application.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesNeural Networks, ComputerSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsAnimalsDogs

Identifiers

PMID36167846
PMCPMC9515104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.