Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167836›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Gene expression based inference of cancer drug sensitivity.

Smriti Chawla, Anja Rockstroh, Melanie Lehman, Ellca Ratther, Atishay Jain, Anuneet Anand, Apoorva Gupta, Namrata Bhattacharya, Sarita Poonia, Priyadarshini Rai and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AnGenes · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Smriti ChawlaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), Okhla, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India.
Anja RockstrohAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2700-375X
Melanie LehmanAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ellca RattherAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Atishay JainDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), Okhla, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India.
Anuneet AnandDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), Okhla, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India.
Apoorva GuptaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University, Shahbad Daulatpur, Main Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042, India.
Namrata BhattacharyaAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sarita PooniaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), Okhla, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India.
Priyadarshini RaiDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), Okhla, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India.
Nirjhar DasDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, Delhi, 110016, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7753-4391
Angshul MajumdarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), Okhla, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India.
JayadevaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, Delhi, 110016, India.
Gaurav AhujaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), Okhla, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2837-9361
Brett G HollierAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1204-6001
Colleen C NelsonAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. colleen.nelson@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6410-4843
Debarka SenguptaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), Okhla, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India. debarka@iiitd.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-6353-5411
Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi · INTranslational Research Institute · AUIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · INDelhi Technological University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inter and intra-tumoral heterogeneity are major stumbling blocks in the treatment of cancer and are responsible for imparting differential drug responses in cancer patients. Recently, the availability of high-throughput screening datasets has paved the way for machine learning based personalized therapy recommendations using the molecular profiles of cancer specimens. In this study, we introduce Precily, a predictive modeling approach to infer treatment response in cancers using gene expression data. In this context, we demonstrate the benefits of considering pathway activity estimates in tandem with drug descriptors as features. We apply Precily on single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data associated with hundreds of cancer cell lines. We then assess the predictability of treatment outcomes using our in-house prostate cancer cell line and xenografts datasets exposed to differential treatment conditions. Further, we demonstrate the applicability of our approach on patient drug response data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and an independent clinical study describing the treatment journey of three melanoma patients. Our findings highlight the importance of chemo-transcriptomics approaches in cancer treatment selection.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMelanomaGene ExpressionHumansMachine LearningMaleSequence Analysis, RNAAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID36167836
PMCPMC9515171
OpenAlexW4297387432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.