Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167832›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Autonomous optimization of non-aqueous Li-ion battery electrolytes via robotic experimentation and machine learning coupling.

Adarsh Dave, Jared Mitchell, Sven Burke, Hongyi Lin, Jay Whitacre, Venkatasubramanian Viswanathan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrolyte Design for Fast-Charging Lithium-Based Batteries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sustainable Materials Design With Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adarsh DaveDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jared MitchellWilton E. Scott Institute for Energy Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Sven BurkeWilton E. Scott Institute for Energy Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3124-5361
Hongyi LinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5845-8378
Jay WhitacreWilton E. Scott Institute for Energy Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. whitacre@andrew.cmu.edu.
Venkatasubramanian ViswanathanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. venkvis@cmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1060-5495
Carnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing high-energy and efficient battery technologies is a crucial aspect of advancing the electrification of transportation and aviation. However, battery innovations can take years to deliver. In the case of non-aqueous battery electrolyte solutions, the many design variables in selecting multiple solvents, salts and their relative ratios make electrolyte optimization time-consuming and laborious. To overcome these issues, we propose in this work an experimental design that couples robotics (a custom-built automated experiment named "Clio") to machine-learning (a Bayesian optimization-based experiment planner named "Dragonfly"). An autonomous optimization of the electrolyte conductivity over a single-salt and ternary solvent design space identifies six fast-charging non-aqueous electrolyte solutions in two work-days and forty-two experiments. This result represents a six-fold time acceleration compared to a random search performed by the same automated experiment. To validate the practical use of these electrolytes, we tested them in a 220 mAh graphite∣∣LiNi

Identifiers

PMID36167832
PMCPMC9515088
OpenAlexW4297324421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.