Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167823›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2023

Majority of erectile dysfunction patients would have preferred earlier implantation of their penile prosthesis: validation of the recently changed EAU guidelines.

Andries Van Huele, Jonas Mennes, Eric Chung, Koenraad Van Renterghem

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predictors of penile prosthesis length: results from the PHOENIX registry.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andries Van HueleDepartment of Urology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium. Andries.vanhuele@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3159-8012
Jonas MennesFaculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eric ChungAndroUrology Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-3668
Koenraad Van RenterghemDepartment of Urology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-6651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until 2019, the European Association of Urology guidelines recommended the implantation of a penile prosthesis as a third-line therapy, which has since then changed to "if other treatments fail or depending on the patient's preference". Primary endpoint was to assess whether patients with a penile prosthesis and their partner would have preferred earlier implantation. Secondary endpoints were the reason why patient and partner wanted earlier implantation, how much earlier they wanted it, satisfaction of patient and partner and if patient and partner would have recommended the intervention. We selected patients with a virgin inflatable penile prosthesis operated between April 2013 and December 2019. We included 155 patients and 65 partners. Telephonic interview was conducted in a structured manner. Further data were collected retrospectively. The preference for earlier implantation was reported in 59.4% of patients and 46.2% of partners. Of them, respectively 53.2% and 46.6% would have wanted the prosthesis more than 5 years earlier. Satisfaction was seen in 83.2% of patients and 73.8% of partners. Respectively 82.6% and 78.4% of patients and partners would recommend the procedure. Our results indicate that a more patient-oriented approach with good counseling is desirable and that the "three-level" concept must be abandoned.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisHumansMalePatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesSexual PartnersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.