ArticlePediatric research2023
Practice variations for fetal and neonatal congenital heart disease within the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium.
Article in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuromonitoring and neuroprotection during neonatal aortic arch surgery: A United Kingdom and Ireland survey.Perfusion · 2026Article
- Neonatal Twin Cobedding: A Mixed Method Study of Policy, Practice and Staff Perceptions in Australia.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Current practice and challenges in fetal cardiac intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Neurodevelopmental follow-up care pathways and processes for children with congenital heart disease in Australia.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Article
- Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Neuromonitoring practices for neonates with congenital heart disease: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- SeqFirst: Building equity access to a precise genetic diagnosis in critically ill newborns.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Establishing a neonatology consultation program: extending care beyond the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Review
- Implementing neurodevelopmental follow-up care for children with congenital heart disease: A scoping review with evidence mapping.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2024Article
- Provision and availability of genomic medicine services in Level IV neonatal intensive care units.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany aspects of care for fetuses and neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD) fall outside standard practice guidelines, leading to the potential for significant variation in clinical care for this vulnerable population.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of site sponsors of the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium, a multicenter collaborative of 41 Level IV neonatal intensive care units to assess key areas of clinical practice variability for patients with fetal and neonatal CHD.
resultsWe received responses from 31 centers. Fetal consult services are shared by neonatology and pediatric cardiology at 70% of centers. Three centers (10%) routinely perform fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women with pregnancies complicated by fetal CHD. Genetic testing for CHD patients is routine at 76% of centers. Preoperative brain MRI is standard practice at 5 centers (17%), while cerebral NIRS monitoring is regularly used at 14 centers (48%). Use of electroencephalogram (EEG) after major cardiac surgery is routine in 5 centers (17%). Neurodevelopmental follow-up programs are offered at 30 centers (97%).
conclusionsMany aspects of fetal and neonatal CHD care are highly variable with evolving shared multidisciplinary models. IMPACT: Many aspects of fetal and neonatal CHD care are highly variable. Genetic testing, placental examination, preoperative neuroimaging, and postoperative EEG monitoring carry a high yield of finding abnormalities in patients with CHD and these tests may contribute to more precise prognostication and improve care. Evidence-based standards for prenatal and postnatal CHD care may decrease inter-center variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.