Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167785›Full record

Trial reportOccupational and environmental medicine2022

Effects of the Labour Inspectorate Authority's regulatory tools on psychosocial and biomechanical work factors in Norwegian home care services: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Bjørnar Finnanger Garshol, Stein Knardahl, Jan Shahid Emberland, Øivind Skare, Håkon A Johannessen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03855163 (Effectiveness of the Labour Inspection Authority's Regulatory Tools on Work Environment and Employee Health - Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Among Norwegian Home-care Workers), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03855163 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of the Labour Inspection Authority's Regulatory Tools on Work Environment and Employee Health - Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Among Norwegian Home-care Workers

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Occupational Health, NorwayRan2019 to 2022Enrolled2,555ConditionsOccupational Health, Sick Leave, Occupational ExposureArmsInspection visits, Guidance workshops, Online risk assessment tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Scoping review on the effect of labour inspections on occupational health and safety: a meta-analytic update.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bjørnar Finnanger GarsholDepartment of Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway bjga@stami.no.ORCID 0000-0003-3201-6608
Stein KnardahlResearch Director, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Shahid EmberlandDepartment of Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Øivind SkareDepartment of Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Håkon A JohannessenDepartment of Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to determine the effects of the Labour Inspectorate Authority's (LIA's) regulatory tools on psychosocial and biomechanical work factors in the Norwegian municipal home care services.

methodsA cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted in the home care services with employee questionnaire data on work factors at baseline, and 6 and 12 months after the interventions. In total, 96 eligible municipalities were randomly assigned to either the control group or one of two interventions: (1) labour inspection visits, based on the LIA's standard inspections; and (2) guidance-through-workshops, where the participating services highlighted issues and trained labour inspectors provided guidance based on existing labour laws and regulations.

resultsNo favourable intervention effect was observed for the inspection intervention. No effects were observed for most of the variables in the guidance intervention, although an effect was observed for the following psychosocial factors: decision control, control over work intensity and empowering leadership. However, after adjusting for multiple testing, none of the observed effects were statistically significant.

conclusionLabour inspections did not affect psychosocial and biomechanical work factors in the home care services. A favourable effect of the guidance intervention on psychosocial work factors was observed. However, this was not evident after adjusting for multiple testing. Further research is needed to elaborate on how labour inspections and other regulatory tools can impact psychosocial and biomechanical work factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03855163.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesHumansNorwaySurveys and QuestionnairesClinical TrialErgonomicsHealth PersonnelOccupational HealthPsychology

Identifiers

PMID36167785
PMCPMC9685717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.