Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167618›Full record

Observational studyArchives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie2022

Changes in pediatric emergency department visits during a COVID-19 lockdown period: An exhaustive single-center analysis.

C de Jorna, M Liber, S El Khalifi, G Neggia, A Martinot, F Dubos

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C de JornaCHU Lille, Paediatric Emergency Unit & Infectious Diseases, F-59000, Lille, France. Electronic address: claire.dejorna@chu-lille.fr.
M LiberCHU Lille, Paediatric Emergency Unit & Infectious Diseases, F-59000, Lille, France.
S El KhalifiCHU Lille, Paediatric Emergency Unit & Infectious Diseases, F-59000, Lille, France.
G NeggiaCHU Lille, Paediatric Emergency Unit & Infectious Diseases, F-59000, Lille, France.
A MartinotCHU Lille, Paediatric Emergency Unit & Infectious Diseases, F-59000, Lille, France; Univ Lille, ULR 2694: METRICS, F-59000, Lille, France.
F DubosCHU Lille, Paediatric Emergency Unit & Infectious Diseases, F-59000, Lille, France; Univ Lille, ULR 2694: METRICS, F-59000, Lille, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn many countries, the restrictions related to the first period of lockdown during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to widespread changes in health service usage in general and in emergency departments in particular. However, no comprehensive evaluation of changes has been published to date. The objective of the present study was to determine the precise impact of the 2020 lockdown on admissions to a pediatric emergency department (PED) compared to the same periods in 2018 and 2019.

methodsThis retrospective, observational study included all patients under the age of 183 months (15.25 years) admitted to our French university hospital's PED during the period from March 17 to May 11 in the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The primary outcome was the change in PED admissions in 2020 compared to 2018 and 2019. The secondary outcomes were notably changes in the primary discharge diagnoses, the discharge destination, and unwarranted visits.

resultsA total of 10,479 PED visits were identified, of which 10,295 were analyzed. In 2020, the number of PED visits fell by 61% and 63% vs. 2018 and 2019, respectively. Although the number of discharges to other hospital departments decreased by 52% and 49%, the proportion of these discharges increased: 18% of 1579 in 2020 vs. 13% of 4232 in 2018 and of 4484 in 2019 (p<0.01). Discharge from the PED to the intensive care unit was significantly more frequent in 2020 (p<0.05). Unwarranted visits were significantly lower in 2020 (19%) as compared to 2018 (22%) and 2019 (24%). Surgical and injury-related discharge diagnoses increased by 6% in 2020 (p<0.001), with a significant rise in trauma and foreign-body injuries (p<0.05). With regard to disease-related discharge diagnoses, we observed a significant rise in mental, behavioral, and social issues (p<0.01). Conversely, there was a significant (p<0.01) drop in diagnoses of acute infectious diseases in 2020 compared with 2018 and 2019.

conclusionLockdown was associated with a massive reduction in the number of PED visits, a significant change in primary discharge diagnoses, and a decrease in the proportion of unwarranted PED visits compared to the previous 2 years. This should encourage public health researchers to examine how to alleviate the burden of unnecessary PED visits.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildCommunicable Disease ControlEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantRetrospective StudiesChildrenCOVID-19Discharge diagnosisLockdownPediatric emergency department

Identifiers

PMID36167618
PMCPMC9376300
OpenAlexW4291889012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.