Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167554›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

False gene and chromosome losses in genome assemblies caused by GC content variation and repeats.

Juwan Kim, Chul Lee, Byung June Ko, Dong Ahn Yoo, Sohyoung Won, Adam M Phillippy, Olivier Fedrigo, Guojie Zhang, Kerstin Howe, Jonathan Wood and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epigenomic methylome landscape of promoters in vertebrate genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The complete genome of a songbird.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Linking phenotype to genotype using comprehensive genomic comparisons.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Juwan Kim *Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chul Lee *Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung June KoDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Ahn YooInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sohyoung WonInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Adam M PhillippyGenome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Olivier FedrigoVertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York City, USA.
Guojie ZhangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Kerstin HoweWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Jonathan WoodWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Richard DurbinWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Giulio FormentiVertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York City, USA.
Samara BrownLaboratory of Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York City, USA.
Lindsey CantinLaboratory of Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York City, USA.
Claudio V MelloDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Seoae ChoeGnome, Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Arang RhieGenome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Heebal KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. heebal@snu.ac.kr.
Erich D JarvisVertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York City, USA. ejarvis@rockefeller.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-5049

Funding

Single-molecule sequence assembly and analysisZIAHG200398 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PHILLIPPY, ADAM · 2016 to 2025
$15.9M
Molecular Profiling of Song Nucleus HVC in the Zebra FinchR03NS059755 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MELLO, CLAUDIO V · 2008 to 2009
$154k
Molecular profiling of the zebra finch brainR03NS115145 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MELLO, CLAUDIO V · 2020 to 2020
$154k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteIntramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200398NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS059755NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS115145Wellcome Trust 207492/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT206194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany short-read genome assemblies have been found to be incomplete and contain mis-assemblies. The Vertebrate Genomes Project has been producing new reference genome assemblies with an emphasis on being as complete and error-free as possible, which requires utilizing long reads, long-range scaffolding data, new assembly algorithms, and manual curation. A more thorough evaluation of the recent references relative to prior assemblies can provide a detailed overview of the types and magnitude of improvements.

resultsHere we evaluate new vertebrate genome references relative to the previous assemblies for the same species and, in two cases, the same individuals, including a mammal (platypus), two birds (zebra finch, Anna's hummingbird), and a fish (climbing perch). We find that up to 11% of genomic sequence is entirely missing in the previous assemblies. In the Vertebrate Genomes Project zebra finch assembly, we identify eight new GC- and repeat-rich micro-chromosomes with high gene density. The impact of missing sequences is biased towards GC-rich 5'-proximal promoters and 5' exon regions of protein-coding genes and long non-coding RNAs. Between 26 and 60% of genes include structural or sequence errors that could lead to misunderstanding of their function when using the previous genome assemblies.

conclusionsOur findings reveal novel regulatory landscapes and protein coding sequences that have been greatly underestimated in previous assemblies and are now present in the Vertebrate Genomes Project reference genomes.

Indexed as

GenomeVertebratesAnimalsBase CompositionChromosomesSequence Analysis, DNAAnnotationGC contentGene structureGenomic dark matterGenomics

Identifiers

PMID36167554
PMCPMC9516821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.