ArticleBMC cancer2022
Liquid biopsy using ascitic fluid and pleural effusion supernatants for genomic profiling in gastrointestinal and lung cancers.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic impact of peritoneal tumour DNA in gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies: a systematic review.British journal of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Advancing the applications of liquid biopsies in oncology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Current Evidence for Circulating Tumor DNA in Sarcoma: Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Application.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy-Based Metabolomics in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Challenges, Methodological Advances and Translational Considerations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Harmonizing definitions in liquid biopsy: A terminology framework by the international society of liquid biopsy.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Review
- Turning Fluids into Data for Precision Oncology: A Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Approach to Malignant Pleural Effusions.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Article
- Comprehensive Liquid Biopsy Approaches for the Clinical Management of Lung Cancer Using Multiple Biological Matrices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in biliary tract cancers: A review of current applications.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Transfer RNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs): A rising star in liquid biopsy.Genes & diseases · 2025Review
- Educational Review: Updates on Therapeutic Strategies for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Inherently imperfect, inherently evolving - The pursuit of precision through biomarkers.Biomedical journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Liquid biopsy in T-cell lymphoma: biomarker detection techniques and clinical application.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Tissue or liquid rebiopsy? A prospective study for simultaneous tissue and liquid NGS after first-line EGFR inhibitor resistance in lung cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Liquid biopsy techniques and pancreatic cancer: diagnosis, monitoring, and evaluation.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- Advancing Cancer Therapy Predictions with Patient-Derived Organoid Models of Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Future Clinical Applications and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Case report: Circulating tumor DNA technology displays temporal and spatial heterogeneity in Waldenström macroglobulinemia during treatment withPathology oncology research : POR · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecision medicine highlights the importance of incorporating molecular genetic testing into standard clinical care. Next-generation sequencing can detect cancer-specific gene mutations, and molecular-targeted drugs can be designed to be effective for one or more specific gene mutations. For patients with special site metastases, it is particularly important to use appropriate samples for genetic profiling. This study aimed to determine whether genomic profiling using ASC and PE is effective in detecting genetic mutations.
methodsTissues, plasma, ascites (ASC) supernatants, and pleural effusion (PE) samples from gastrointestinal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and lung cancer patients with pleural metastasis were collected for comprehensive genomic profiling. The samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing using a panel of 59 or 1021 cancer-relevant genes panel.
resultsA total of 156 tissues, 188 plasma samples, 45 ASC supernatants, and 1 PE samples from 304 gastrointestinal cancer patients and 446 PE supernatants, 122 tissues, 389 plasma samples, and 45 PE sediments from 407 lung cancer patients were analyzed. The MSAF was significantly higher in ASC and PE supernatant than that in plasma ctDNA (50.00% vs. 3.00%, p < 0.0001 and 28.5% vs. 1.30%, p < 0.0001, respectively). The ASC supernatant had a higher actionable mutation rate and more actionable alterations than the plasma ctDNA in 26 paired samples. The PE supernatant had a higher total actionable mutation rate than plasma (80.3% vs. 48.4%, p < 0.05). The PE supernatant had a higher frequency of uncommon variations than the plasma regardless of distant organ metastasis.
conclusionASC and PE supernatants could be better alternative samples when tumor tissues are not available, especially in patients with only peritoneal or pleural metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.