ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
A statistical network pre-processing method to improve relevance and significance of gene lists in microarray gene expression studies.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Transcriptomics: Applications of Unsupervised and Supervised Learning.Cells · 2025Review
- Genetic Biomarkers of Sorafenib Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroarrays can perform large scale studies of differential expressed gene (DEGs) and even single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), thereby screening thousands of genes for single experiment simultaneously. However, DEGs and SNPs are still just as enigmatic as the first sequence of the genome. Because they are independent from the affected biological context. Pathway enrichment analysis (PEA) can overcome this obstacle by linking both DEGs and SNPs to the affected biological pathways and consequently to the underlying biological functions and processes.
resultsTo improve the enrichment analysis results, we present a new statistical network pre-processing method by mapping DEGs and SNPs on a biological network that can improve the relevance and significance of the DEGs or SNPs of interest to incorporate pathway topology information into the PEA. The proposed methodology improves the statistical significance of the PEA analysis in terms of computed p value for each enriched pathways and limit the number of enriched pathways. This helps reduce the number of relevant biological pathways with respect to a non-specific list of genes.
conclusionThe proposed method provides two-fold enhancements. Network analysis reveals fewer DEGs, by selecting only relevant DEGs and the detected DEGs improve the enriched pathways' statistical significance, rather than simply using a general list of genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.