Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167240›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2023

Engineered biomaterials to guide spheroid formation, function, and fabrication into 3D tissue constructs.

Nikolas Di Caprio, Jason A Burdick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nikolas Di CaprioDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jason A BurdickDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA; Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. Electronic address: jason.burdick@colorado.edu.

Funding

Dynamic Fibrous Scaffolds for Repairing Dense Connective TissuesR01AR056624 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jason A Burdick, Robert L Mauck · 2009 to 2026
$7.5M
Engineered Developmental Microenvironments: Cartilage Formation and MaturationR01AR077362 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BURDICK, JASON A, MAUCK, ROBERT L · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056624NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular spheroids are aggregates of cells that are being explored to address fundamental biological questions and as building blocks for engineered tissues. Spheroids possess distinct advantages over cellular monolayers or cell encapsulation in 3D natural and synthetic hydrogels, including direct cell-cell interactions and high cell densities, which better mimic aspects of many tissues. Despite these advantages, spheroid cultures often exhibit uncontrollable growth and may be too simplistic to mimic complex tissue structures. To address this, biomaterials are being leveraged to further expand the use of cellular spheroids for biomedical applications. In this review, we provide an overview of recent studies that utilize engineered biomaterials to guide spheroid formation and function, as well as their fabrication into tissues for use as tissue models and for therapeutic applications. First, we describe biomaterial strategies that allow the high-throughput fabrication of homogeneously-sized spheroids. Next, we summarize how engineered biomaterials are introduced into spheroid cultures either internally as microparticles or externally as hydrogel microenvironments to influence spheroid behavior (e.g., differentiation, fusion). Lastly, we discuss a variety of biofabrication strategies (e.g., 3D bioprinting, melt electrowriting) that have been used to develop macroscale tissue models and implantable constructs through the guided assembly of spheroids. Overall, the goal of this review is to provide a summary of how biomaterials are currently being engineered and leveraged to support spheroids in biomedical applications, as well as to provide a future outlook of the field. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Cellular spheroids are becoming increasingly used as in vitro tissue models or as 'building blocks' for tissue engineering and repair strategies. Engineered biomaterials and their processing through biofabrication approaches are being leveraged to structurally support and guide spheroid processes. This review summarizes current approaches where such biomaterials are being used to guide spheroid formation, function, and fabrication into tissue constructs. As the field is rapidly expanding, we also provide an outlook on future directions and how new engineered biomaterials can be implemented to further the development of biofabricated spheroid-based tissue constructs.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsMesenchymal Stem CellsHydrogelsSpheroids, CellularTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsBiofabricationBiomaterialBioprintingHydrogelScaffoldsSpheroidTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36167240
PMCPMC10928646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.