SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2022
Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrostimulation in COPD subjects on mechanical ventilation. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Impact of the association of strength training with neuromuscular electrostimulation on the functionality of individuals with functional decline during senescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hospitalised adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Age and ageing · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrostimulation (NMES) in adults with COPD undergoing MV.
methodA sensitive search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and other resources. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs that enrolled adults with COPD on MV due to an exacerbation of their disease were included. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted information, and assessed the risk of bias (RoB 2 tool) and the certainty of evidence (GRADE approach) from the included studies.
resultsFour RCTs (144 participants) were included. Subjects who underwent NMES were able to move from bed to chair independently in less time (MD = 4.98 days less; 95% CI -8.55 to -1.47; 2 RCTs; low certainty of the evidence) and they were fewer days on MV (MD = 2.89 days less; 95% CI -4.58 to -1.21); 3 RCTs; low certainty of the evidence) than the control group. However, the effect of NMES on muscle strength is unclear (very low certainty of the evidence).
conclusionsNMES may improve functional independence and decrease MV time in adults with COPD; however, its effectiveness on muscle strength is uncertain. More and better RCTs are needed to determine with greater certainty the effectiveness of NMES in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.