Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36166842›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Fish and Fish-Based Products for Nutrition and Health in the First 1000 Days: A Systematic Review of the Evidence from Low and Middle-Income Countries.

Kendra A Byrd, Jacqueline Shieh, Stephanie Mork, Lauren Pincus, Lydia O'Meara, Molly Atkins, Shakuntala H Thilsted

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dried fish provide widespread access to critical nutrients across Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kendra A ByrdWorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4528-752X
Jacqueline ShiehWorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9516-980X
Stephanie MorkSt Catherine University, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Lauren PincusWorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8883-7264
Lydia O'MearaWorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0670-5322
Molly AtkinsWorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.
Shakuntala H ThilstedWorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4041-1651
WorldFish · MYNatural Resources Institute · GBSt. Catherine University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish provide essential nutrients for the critical window of growth and development in the first 1000 d of life and are thus an attractive option for inclusion in nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-specific programming. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence for fish and fish-based products for nutrition and health outcomes during the first 1000 d of life in low- and middle-income countries, searching the peer-reviewed and gray literature from 1999 to 2020. Databases included PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, and the Clinical Trials repository. Our search returned 1135 articles, 39 of which met the inclusion criteria. All studies were dual evaluated for risk of bias. Of the included studies, 18 measured maternal health and nutrition outcomes and 24 measured infant/child outcomes (3 measured both). Our search uncovered 10 impact evaluations, all of which measured consumption of fish or fish-based complementary food products in children aged 6-24 mo. We did not find strong evidence for fish consumption in children improving child growth from the impact evaluations; however, the studies were highly heterogeneous in their design and likely underpowered to detect an effect. Results from observational studies were mixed but provided evidence that adding fish to maternal and child diets is associated with improved nutrition outcomes, such as reducing the risk of anemia and improving vitamin D status. Given the nutrient richness of fish and the fact that production is often more environmentally friendly as compared with other animal source foods, more robust evidence is needed on the role of fish consumption in nutrition interventions to inform policy and programming recommendations in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesNutritional StatusAnimalsDietHumansNutrientsVitaminsNutrientsVitaminsaquatic foodsbreastfeedingcomplementary feedingfishIYCF practicesmaternal dietspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36166842
PMCPMC9776644
OpenAlexW4297207119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.