Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36166660›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

NASH and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Immunology and Immunotherapy.

Matthias Pinter, David J Pinato, Pierluigi Ramadori, Mathias Heikenwalder

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AAV9-MediatedPharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthias Pinter *Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7260-532X
David J Pinato *Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-0103
Pierluigi RamadoriDivision of Chronic Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6581-9648
Mathias HeikenwalderDivision of Chronic Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3135-2274
German Cancer Research Center · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last 10 years have revolutionized our basic understanding of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and consequent liver cancer. It has become clear that several innate and adaptive immune cells play an important role in initiating, maintaining, or exacerbating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-a disease that has been recently defined as autoaggressive. Despite improved disease management aimed at reducing the progression of fibrosis, NASH is set to become a leading cause for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preliminary data from preclinical studies suggest that immunotherapy efficacy may be reduced in NASH-related HCC compared with viral HCC; however, conclusive evidence supporting clinical translation of these findings is lacking. Comprehensive clinical and immunologic phenotyping of mechanisms linking NASH progression with carcinogenesis and therapeutic resistance is key to prevent progression to cirrhosis, improve monitoring and stratification of NASH according to predicted cancer risk, and ultimately increase survival of patients with NASH-HCC. In this review, we summarize the state of the art in the field of NASH and NASH-HCC with focus on immunobiology. We discuss preclinical and clinical findings underpinning NASH as an immunologically distinct pro-tumorigenic disease entity, and explore areas of potential therapeutic vulnerabilities in NASH-associated HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseCarcinogenesisFibrosisHumansImmunotherapyLiver Cirrhosis

Identifiers

PMID36166660
PMCPMC9890137
OpenAlexW4297338588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.