ReviewIEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics2023
Multi-View Design Patterns and Responsive Visualization for Genomics Data.
Review in IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geranium: Multimodal Retrieval of Genomics Data Visualizations.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2026Article
- Aardvark: Composite Visualizations of Trees, Time-Series, and Images.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2025Article
- Learnable and Expressive Visualization Authoring Through Blended Interfaces.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2025Article
- Understanding Visualization Authoring Techniques for Genomics Data in the Context of Personas and Tasks.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2025Article
- GenoREC: A Recommendation System for Interactive Genomics Data Visualization.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2023Article
- The thorny complexities of visualization research for clinical settings: A case study from genomics.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A series of recent studies has focused on designing cross-resolution and cross-device visualizations, i.e., responsive visualization, a concept adopted from responsive web design. However, these studies mainly focused on visualizations with a single view to a small number of views, and there are still unresolved questions about how to design responsive multi-view visualizations. In this paper, we present a reusable and generalizable framework for designing responsive multi-view visualizations focused on genomics data. To gain a better understanding of existing design challenges, we review web-based genomics visualization tools in the wild. By characterizing tools based on a taxonomy of responsive designs, we find that responsiveness is rarely supported in existing tools. To distill insights from the survey results in a systematic way, we classify typical view composition patterns, such as "vertically long," "horizontally wide," "circular," and "cross-shaped" compositions. We then identify their usability issues in different resolutions that stem from the composition patterns, as well as discussing approaches to address the issues and to make genomics visualizations responsive. By extending the Gosling visualization grammar to support responsive constructs, we show how these approaches can be supported. A valuable follow-up study would be taking different input modalities into account, such as mouse and touch interactions, which was not considered in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.