Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36166472›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2022

Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors Treated with Procarbazine and/or Infradiaphragmatic Radiotherapy.

Berbel L M Ykema, Andrea Gini, Lisanne S Rigter, Manon C W Spaander, Leon M G Moons, Tanya M Bisseling, Jan Paul de Boer, Wieke H M Verbeek, Pieternella J Lugtenburg, Cecile P M Janus and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long Term Results of Proton Therapy in Adult Infradiaphragmatic Lymphoma.International journal of particle therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Berbel L M Ykema *Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0314-7986
Andrea Gini *Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7696-0580
Lisanne S RigterDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1894-3440
Manon C W SpaanderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-9757
Leon M G MoonsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6913-9954
Tanya M BisselingDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7976-7949
Jan Paul de BoerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-6128
Wieke H M VerbeekDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5498-6093
Pieternella J LugtenburgDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6735-8651
Cecile P M JanusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3860-8698
Eefke J PetersenDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7885-9163
Judith M RoesinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-0405
Richard W M van der MaazenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0360-9172
DICHOS study group
Berthe M P AlemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2306-6590
Gerrit A MeijerDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-3130
Flora E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5871-1484
Petur SnaebjornssonDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-8108
Beatriz CarvalhoDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4903-399X
Monique E van LeerdamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-3208
Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar *Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-2753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy (IRT) and/or procarbazine have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer surveillance in Dutch Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to determine the optimal surveillance strategy for different Hodgkin lymphoma subgroups.

methodsThe Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon model was adjusted to reflect colorectal cancer and other-cause mortality risk in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Ninety colorectal cancer surveillance strategies were evaluated varying in starting and stopping age, interval, and modality [colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test (FIT, OC-Sensor; cutoffs: 10/20/47 μg Hb/g feces), and multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard)]. Analyses were also stratified per primary treatment (IRT and procarbazine or procarbazine without IRT). Colorectal cancer deaths averted (compared with no surveillance) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were primary outcomes. The optimal surveillance strategy was identified assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per life-years gained (LYG).

resultsOverall, the optimal surveillance strategy was annual FIT (47 μg) from age 45 to 70 years, which might avert 70% of colorectal cancer deaths in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (compared with no surveillance; ICER:€18,000/LYG). The optimal surveillance strategy in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with procarbazine without IRT was biennial FIT (47 μg) from age 45 to 70 years (colorectal cancer mortality averted 56%; ICER:€15,000/LYG), and when treated with IRT and procarbazine, annual FIT (47 μg) surveillance from age 40 to 70 was most cost-effective (colorectal cancer mortality averted 75%; ICER:€13,000/LYG).

conclusionsColorectal cancer surveillance in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors is cost-effective and should commence earlier than screening occurs in population screening programs. For all subgroups, FIT surveillance was the most cost-effective strategy. IMPACT: Colorectal cancer surveillance should be implemented in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHodgkin DiseaseAdultAgedColonoscopyCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerHumansMiddle AgedOccult BloodProcarbazineSurvivorsProcarbazine

Identifiers

PMID36166472
PMCPMC9720424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.