Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36166454›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Spring-infusors: How a simple and small solution can create king-sized complexity.

Pamela Laird, Charlotte Burr, Fenella J Gill, André Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pamela LairdWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9799-0471
Charlotte BurrDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Fenella J GillNursing Research, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
André SchultzWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aims of the study were to investigate family and hospital staff views about the use of spring-infusor devices for administration of intravenous antibiotic medications, to examine if the device is acceptable and feasible and to map a process for implementation.

designA qualitative study with a pragmatist approach, within a larger, mixed methods knowledge translation study.

methodsData were collected by semi-structured interviews with patients who have cystic fibrosis and their parents and focus groups and interviews with hospital staff. Interviews were concluded when no new themes were identified. Thematic analysis and process mapping was undertaken.

resultsSix parents, nine children and 30 staff were interviewed. Families preferred spring-infusors. Staff knowledge, experience and attitudes toward spring-infusor use was varied. All staff acknowledged that their role is to support patient-centred care. Spring-infusors are preferred by families and clinicians above other IV administration devices but misconceptions about spring-infusor use and numerous procedural challenges reduced their use.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPersonnel, HospitalChildFocus GroupsHumansInfusion PumpsQualitative Researchcystic fibrosisfamily centred carespring-infusor

Identifiers

PMID36166454
PMCPMC9834515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.