Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36166395›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular journal of Africa

Atrial and ventricular arrhythmia predictors with electrocardiographic parameters in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA).

Serkan Asil, Muhammet Geneş, Salim Yaşar, Serdar Fırtına, Suat Görmel, Erkan Yıldırım, Yalçın Gökoğlan, Hatice Tolunay, Barış Buğan, Ayşe Saatçi Yaşar and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular journal of Africa. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Serkan AsilDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Email: dr_serkanasil@hotmail.com.
Muhammet GeneşDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Salim YaşarDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Serdar FırtınaDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Suat GörmelDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Erkan YıldırımDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Yalçın GökoğlanDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Hatice TolunayDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Barış BuğanDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ayşe Saatçi YaşarDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Murat ÇelikDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Uygar Çağdaş YükselDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Cem BarçınDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Hasan Kutsi KabulDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical importance and recognition of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is increasing. Nevertheless, no studies are investigating the risk of atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmia in MINOCA patients. This study aimed to determine the risk of arrhythmia with electrocardiographic predictors in MINOCA patients.

methodsIn this study, patients diagnosed with MINOCA and stable out-patients without significant lesions in their coronary arteries were compared. Morphology-voltage-Pwave duration electrocardiography (MPV ECG) score was used to determine atrial arrhythmia risk. QT interval and QT dispersion T

resultsA total of 155 patients were included in our study. Seventy-seven of these patients were in the MINOCA group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in MPV ECG score (1.95 ± 1.03 vs 1.68 ± 1.14,

conclusionsIn the MINOCA patients, there was no increase in the risk of atrial fibrillation based on ECG predictors. However, it was shown that there could be a significant increase in the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. We believe this study could be helpful for specific recommendations concerning duration of hospitalisation and follow up in MINOCA patients.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCoronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionElectrocardiographyHumansMINOCARisk Factorsarrhythmiaatrial fibrillationelectrocardiographyMINOCAventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID36166395
PMCPMC10870316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.