ReviewJMIR medical informatics2022
The Value of Electronic Health Records Since the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act: Systematic Review.
Review in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Drug Discovery: Promise, Challenges, and Emerging Opportunities.Cancers · 2026Review
- Users' opinions on the use of electronic health records at the Upper East Regional Hospital, Ghana: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Exploring Technological Solutions for Interoperability Between Patient Electronic Medical Records and Clinical Registries: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Age- and sex-stratified prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea and stroke risk comorbidities: A large cross-sectional EHR study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Health management gaps and EHR willingness among ethnic minority residents with rural backgrounds in Yunnan, China: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Sociotechnical Needs of Registered Nurses in the Heart Failure Hospitalizations of African American Patients: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR nursing · 2025Observational
- Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine-Associated Bradycardia and Related Drug-Drug Interactions Using Electronic Health Record (EHR) and miRNA Target Analysis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Incompleteness of Electronic Health Records: An Impending Process Problem Within Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing substance use detection in clinical notes with large language models.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Article
- Mitigating Burnout: The Role of Healthcare Organizations.ATS scholar · 2025Article
- The Changing Landscape of Antibiotic Treatment: Reevaluating Treatment Length in the Age of New Agents.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Substance Use Detection in Clinical Notes with Large Language Models.Research square · 2025Article
- Assessing Patient-Reported Satisfaction With Care and Documentation Time in Primary Care Through AI-Driven Automatic Clinical Note Generation: Protocol for a Proof-of-Concept Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Measuring productivity in the healthcare sector: a bibliometric and content analysis.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Experiences and reflections of doctors on the operations of designated clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Assessing the factors militating against the effective implementation of electronic health records (EHR) in Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Current Health Data Standardization Project and Future Directions to Ensure Interoperability in Korea.Healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- Biases in Electronic Health Records Data for Generating Real-World Evidence: An Overview.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- Article
- Exploring the Economic Aspects of Hospitals: A Comprehensive Examination of Relevant Factors.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) are the electronic records of patient health information created during ≥1 encounter in any health care setting. The Health Information Technology Act of 2009 has been a major driver of the adoption and implementation of EHRs in the United States. Given that the adoption of EHRs is a complex and expensive investment, a return on this investment is expected.
objectiveThis literature review aims to focus on how the value of EHRs as an intervention is defined in relation to the elaboration of value into 2 different value outcome categories, financial and clinical outcomes, and to understand how EHRs contribute to these 2 value outcome categories.
methodsThis literature review was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The initial search of key terms, EHRs, values, financial outcomes, and clinical outcomes in 3 different databases yielded 971 articles, of which, after removing 410 (42.2%) duplicates, 561 (57.8%) were incorporated in the title and abstract screening. During the title and abstract screening phase, articles were excluded from further review phases if they met any of the following criteria: not relevant to the outcomes of interest, not relevant to EHRs, nonempirical, and non-peer reviewed. After the application of the exclusion criteria, 80 studies remained for a full-text review. After evaluating the full text of the residual 80 studies, 26 (33%) studies were excluded as they did not address the impact of EHR adoption on the outcomes of interest. Furthermore, 4 additional studies were discovered through manual reference searches and were added to the total, resulting in 58 studies for analysis. A qualitative analysis tool, ATLAS.ti. (version 8.2), was used to categorize and code the final 58 studies.
resultsThe findings from the literature review indicated a combination of positive and negative impacts of EHRs on financial and clinical outcomes. Of the 58 studies surveyed for this review of the literature, 5 (9%) reported on the intersection of financial and clinical outcomes. To investigate this intersection further, the category "Value-Intersection of Financial and Clinical Outcomes" was generated. Approximately 80% (4/5) of these studies specified a positive association between EHR adoption and financial and clinical outcomes.
conclusionsThis review of the literature reports on the individual and collective value of EHRs from a financial and clinical outcomes perspective. The collective perspective examined the intersection of financial and clinical outcomes, suggesting a reversal of the current understanding of how IT investments could generate improvements in productivity, and prompted a new question to be asked about whether an increase in productivity could potentially lead to more IT investments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.