Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36166095›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

No advantage with navigated versus conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty-10 year results of a randomised controlled trial.

Omer M Farhan-Alanie, Tareq Altell, Sinead O'Donnell, Pauline May, James Doonan, Philip Rowe, Bryn Jones, Mark J G Blyth

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is technological-assisted leg axis alignment reliable in total knee arthroplasty with varus-valgus deformities?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Omer M Farhan-AlanieDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6716-4155
Tareq AltellDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.
Sinead O'DonnellDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.
Pauline MayDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.
James DoonanDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.
Philip RoweBioengineering Unit, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building, 50 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK.
Bryn JonesDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.
Mark J G BlythDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComputer-assisted surgery (CAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial area of surgical practice. The aim of this study is to report the ten-year revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) of a single-blinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing electromagnetically (EM) navigated and conventional TKA.

methods199 patients were randomised to receive either EM navigated or conventional TKA where the aim of implantation was neutral mechanical alignment in all cases. Ten-year revision rates were collated and compared between the two intervention groups. Longitudinal PROMS data was collected prospectively at various time points up to 10 years post-operatively.

resultsOver the ten-year period, there were 23 deaths (22.8%) in the EM navigation cohort and 30 deaths (30.6%) in the conventional cohort. At 10 years post-operatively, there was no statistically significant difference in all cause revision between the EM navigation and conventional cohort (4.0 vs 6.1%, p = 0.429). When analysing causes of revision that might be influenced by utilising EM navigation, there was no statistically significant difference in revisions (3.0% EM navigated vs 4.1% conventional group, p = 0.591). Patients that received navigated TKAs had improved Oxford Knee Society, American Knee Society Score and range of motion at 3 months following surgery compared to conventional TKA (p = 0.002, p = 0.032, and p = 0.05, respectively). However, from 1 to 10 years post-operatively, both interventions had equivalent outcomes.

conclusionThere is no difference in revision rates or clinical outcomes comparing EM navigated versus conventional TKA at ten-year follow-up. The expected mortality rate makes it unlikely that a difference in revision rates will reach statistical significance in the future. In the setting of an experienced knee arthroplasty surgeon, it is difficult to justify the additional costs of CAS in TKA surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComputer Assisted SurgeryEM NavigationKnee arthroplastyRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID36166095
PMCPMC9957903
OpenAlexW4297253811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.